RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell vs Radeon Pro 560X

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 560X with RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, including specs and performance data.

Pro 560X
2018
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
9.21

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell outperforms Pro 560X by a whopping 833% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5026
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.87
Power efficiency8.69no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code namePolaris 21GB202
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date16 July 2018 (6 years ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$8,565

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102424064
Core clock speed1004 MHz1590 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2617 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate64.261,968
Floating-point processing power2.056 TFLOPS126 TFLOPS
ROPs16192
TMUs64752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Coresno data188

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount4 GB96 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed1270 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth81.28 GB/s1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 2.1b

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro 560X 9.21
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 85.96
+833%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 560X 3677
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 34320
+833%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD41
−754%
350−400
+754%
1440p43
−830%
400−450
+830%
4K17
−782%
150−160
+782%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data24.47
1440pno data21.41
4Kno data57.10

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 16−18
−782%
150−160
+782%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−751%
400−450
+751%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−789%
160−170
+789%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 16−18
−782%
150−160
+782%
Battlefield 5 43
−830%
400−450
+830%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−751%
400−450
+751%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−789%
160−170
+789%
Far Cry 5 37
−711%
300−310
+711%
Fortnite 66
−809%
600−650
+809%
Forza Horizon 4 53
−749%
450−500
+749%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−826%
250−260
+826%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−806%
290−300
+806%
Valorant 85−90
−809%
800−850
+809%

Full HD
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 16−18
−782%
150−160
+782%
Battlefield 5 36
−733%
300−310
+733%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−751%
400−450
+751%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 86
−830%
800−850
+830%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−789%
160−170
+789%
Dota 2 71
−815%
650−700
+815%
Far Cry 5 33
−809%
300−310
+809%
Fortnite 40
−775%
350−400
+775%
Forza Horizon 4 50
−800%
450−500
+800%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−826%
250−260
+826%
Grand Theft Auto V 33
−809%
300−310
+809%
Metro Exodus 19
−795%
170−180
+795%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40
−775%
350−400
+775%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 34
−782%
300−310
+782%
Valorant 85−90
−809%
800−850
+809%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 16−18
−782%
150−160
+782%
Battlefield 5 33
−809%
300−310
+809%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−789%
160−170
+789%
Dota 2 69
−770%
600−650
+770%
Far Cry 5 31
−803%
280−290
+803%
Forza Horizon 4 36
−733%
300−310
+733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−806%
290−300
+806%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
−800%
180−190
+800%
Valorant 26
−823%
240−250
+823%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 32
−806%
290−300
+806%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−775%
140−150
+775%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 57
−777%
500−550
+777%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−817%
110−120
+817%
Metro Exodus 11
−809%
100−105
+809%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−809%
400−450
+809%
Valorant 100−110
−791%
900−950
+791%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 10−11
−800%
90−95
+800%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−805%
190−200
+805%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−829%
65−70
+829%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−789%
160−170
+789%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−805%
190−200
+805%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−823%
120−130
+823%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
−795%
170−180
+795%

4K
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30
−833%
280−290
+833%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
−823%
120−130
+823%
Metro Exodus 7
−829%
65−70
+829%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−789%
80−85
+789%
Valorant 45−50
−751%
400−450
+751%

4K
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−800%
90−95
+800%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Dota 2 30−35
−809%
300−310
+809%
Far Cry 5 10
−800%
90−95
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−833%
140−150
+833%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−775%
70−75
+775%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
−775%
70−75
+775%

This is how Pro 560X and RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 754% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 830% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 782% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.21 85.96
Recency 16 July 2018 18 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 96 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 600 Watt

Pro 560X has 700% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, on the other hand, has a 833.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 560X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 560X is a mobile workstation card while RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560X
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 195 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 560X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 13 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 560X or RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.