GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs Radeon Pro 560X

Place in the ranking	462	181
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	8.86	18.45
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Polaris 21	TU106
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	16 July 2018 (6 years ago)	29 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	1920
Core clock speed	1004 MHz	960 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1200 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	115 Watt
Texture fill rate	64.26	144.0
Floating-point processing power	2.056 TFLOPS	4.608 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	48
TMUs	64	120
Tensor Cores	no data	240
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	30

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1270 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	81.28 GB/s	336.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	+	-
VR Ready	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 560X 9.53

RTX 2060 Mobile 30.44
+219%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Pro 560X 7590

RTX 2060 Mobile 21262
+180%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Pro 560X 5699

RTX 2060 Mobile 16331
+187%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Pro 560X 32449

RTX 2060 Mobile 99179
+206%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Pro 560X 255217

RTX 2060 Mobile 411721
+61.3%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Pro 560X 1614

RTX 2060 Mobile 6141
+280%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	39 −162%	102 +162%
1440p	26 −142%	63 +142%
4K	15 −160%	39 +160%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16

−227%

45−50
+227%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	31 −194%	91 +194%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −407%	71 +407%
Battlefield 5	49 −143%	119 +143%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	29 −203%	88 +203%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −227%	45−50 +227%
Far Cry 5	28 −275%	105 +275%
Far Cry New Dawn	38 −189%	110 +189%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −472%	366 +472%
Hitman 3	18−20 −361%	83 +361%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −321%	223 +321%
Metro Exodus	41 −217%	130 +217%
Red Dead Redemption 2	36 −178%	100 +178%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	57 −160%	148 +160%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −266%	227 +266%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50 −114%	107 +114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −300%	56 +300%
Battlefield 5	42 −150%	105 +150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	25 −216%	79 +216%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −227%	45−50 +227%
Far Cry 5	26 −227%	85 +227%
Far Cry New Dawn	28 −193%	82 +193%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −338%	280 +338%
Hitman 3	18−20 −317%	75 +317%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −270%	196 +270%
Metro Exodus	33 −239%	112 +239%
Red Dead Redemption 2	29 −159%	75 +159%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −297%	123 +297%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −138%	60−65 +138%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −206%	190 +206%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14 −257%	50 +257%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −243%	48 +243%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18 −222%	58 +222%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −227%	45−50 +227%
Far Cry 5	19 −226%	62 +226%
Forza Horizon 4	36 −144%	88 +144%
Hitman 3	18−20 −267%	66 +267%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −77.4%	94 +77.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −245%	107 +245%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20 −200%	60 +200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +63.2%	38 −63.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−216%

79
+216%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −242%	65 +242%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −260%	54 +260%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −344%	40 +344%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −660%	38 +660%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −320%	42 +320%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −400%	20−22 +400%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −282%	42 +282%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −500%	246 +500%
Hitman 3	12−14 −254%	46 +254%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 −250%	70 +250%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −300%	55−60 +300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −458%	65−70 +458%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −322%	35−40 +322%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −250%	210 +250%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−288%

62
+288%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 −256%	32 +256%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −329%	30 +329%
Hitman 3	6−7 −367%	28 +367%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −115%	86 +115%
Metro Exodus	7−8 −400%	35−40 +400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −457%	39 +457%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −400%	25 +400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −450%	22 +450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −400%	20 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −320%	21 +320%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −233%	40−45 +233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −533%	35−40 +533%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −400%	15 +400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10

−233%

30
+233%

This is how Pro 560X and RTX 2060 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 2060 Mobile is 162% faster in 1080p
RTX 2060 Mobile is 142% faster in 1440p
RTX 2060 Mobile is 160% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 560X is 63% faster.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 2060 Mobile is 700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Pro 560X is ahead in 1 test (1%)
RTX 2060 Mobile is ahead in 71 test (99%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.53	30.44
Recency	16 July 2018	29 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	115 Watt

Pro 560X has 53.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 2060 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 219.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 months, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 560X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 560X is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.