NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti vs AMD Radeon Pro 5600M

#ad
Buy
VS

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking2068
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for moneyno data14.03
ArchitectureNavi / RDNA (2019−2020)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 10Ampere GA102
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date15 June 2020 (3 years old)27 January 2022 (2 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,999
Current priceno data$1251 (0.6x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256010752
Core clock speedno data1560 MHz
Boost clock speed1265 MHz1860 MHz
Number of transistorsno data28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt450 Watt
Texture fill rate164.8625.0

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro 5600M and GeForce RTX 3090 Ti compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data336 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount8 GB24 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1540 MBps21000 MHz
Memory bandwidth394.2 GB/s1,008 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDAno data8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 5600M
23.93

GeForce RTX 3090 Ti outperforms Radeon Pro 5600M by 221% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro 5600M 9282
RTX 3090 Ti 29808
+221%

GeForce RTX 3090 Ti outperforms Radeon Pro 5600M by 221% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD65−70
−223%
210
+223%
1440p40−45
−250%
140
+250%
4K30−35
−237%
101
+237%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−462%
219
+462%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−149%
110−120
+149%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−272%
160
+272%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−113%
160−170
+113%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
−183%
170−180
+183%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−415%
201
+415%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−167%
160−170
+167%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−121%
130−140
+121%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−166%
210−220
+166%
Hitman 3 70−75
−200%
210−220
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−231%
160−170
+231%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−236%
130−140
+236%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−400%
265
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−272%
171
+272%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−149%
110−120
+149%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−221%
138
+221%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−113%
160−170
+113%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
−183%
170−180
+183%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−344%
173
+344%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−167%
160−170
+167%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−121%
130−140
+121%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−166%
210−220
+166%
Hitman 3 70−75
−200%
210−220
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−231%
160−170
+231%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−345%
178
+345%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−236%
130−140
+236%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−374%
251
+374%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−630%
394
+630%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−235%
154
+235%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−149%
110−120
+149%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−186%
123
+186%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−113%
160−170
+113%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−290%
152
+290%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−167%
160−170
+167%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−121%
130−140
+121%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−166%
210−220
+166%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−257%
193
+257%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−183%
130
+183%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−281%
140−150
+281%
Hitman 3 40−45
−340%
170−180
+340%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−313%
130−140
+313%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−421%
125
+421%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−333%
75−80
+333%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−475%
184
+475%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−227%
85−90
+227%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−350%
108
+350%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−175%
140−150
+175%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−593%
104
+593%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−259%
140−150
+259%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−167%
120−130
+167%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−277%
180−190
+277%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−324%
140−150
+324%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−500%
108
+500%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−394%
85−90
+394%
Hitman 3 21−24
−377%
100−110
+377%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−371%
80−85
+371%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−460%
84
+460%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−300%
50−55
+300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−524%
106
+524%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−565%
173
+565%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−281%
60−65
+281%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−462%
73
+462%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−271%
100−110
+271%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−783%
53
+783%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−370%
90−95
+370%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−313%
95−100
+313%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−328%
130−140
+328%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−536%
70
+536%

This is how Pro 5600M and RTX 3090 Ti compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • RTX 3090 Ti is 223% faster than Pro 5600M

1440p resolution:

  • RTX 3090 Ti is 250% faster than Pro 5600M

4K resolution:

  • RTX 3090 Ti is 237% faster than Pro 5600M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3090 Ti is 783% faster than the Pro 5600M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 3090 Ti surpassed Pro 5600M in all 68 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 23.93 76.83
Recency 15 June 2020 27 January 2022
Memory bus width 2048 384
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 24 GB
Memory bandwidth 394.2 1
Pipelines / CUDA cores 2560 10752
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 450 Watt

The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 5600M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your own vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 69 votes

Rate AMD Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 2947 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.