GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon Pro 555X
Aggregated performance score
GeForce GTX 750 Ti outperforms Radeon Pro 555X by 21% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 467 | 410 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 21 |
| Value for money | 1.76 | 1.08 |
| Architecture | Polaris (2016−2019) | Maxwell (2014−2018) |
| GPU code name | Polaris 21 | GM107 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 June 2017 (6 years ago) | 18 February 2014 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $149 |
| Current price | $894 | $357 (2.4x MSRP) |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Pro 555X has 63% better value for money than GTX 750 Ti.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 640 |
| CUDA cores | no data | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 855 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1085 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 60 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 43.54 | 43.40 |
| Floating-point performance | no data | 1,389 gflops |
Size and compatibility
Information on Radeon Pro 555X and GeForce GTX 750 Ti compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Bus support | no data | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
| Height | no data | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 5.4 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.6 GB/s | 86.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMI |
| Multi monitor support | no data | 4 displays |
| HDMI | no data | + |
| HDCP | no data | + |
| Maximum VGA resolution | no data | 2048x1536 |
| Audio input for HDMI | no data | Internal |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | + | no data |
| Blu Ray 3D | no data | + |
| 3D Gaming | no data | + |
| 3D Vision | no data | + |
| 3D Vision Live | no data | + |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti outperforms Radeon Pro 555X by 21% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
GeForce GTX 750 Ti outperforms Radeon Pro 555X by 21% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 9%
Radeon Pro 555X outperforms GeForce GTX 750 Ti by 11% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.
GeekBench 5 Vulkan
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 5%
Radeon Pro 555X outperforms GeForce GTX 750 Ti by 31% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 40−45
−25%
| 50
+25%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−23.1%
|
16−18
+23.1%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 16−18
−23.5%
|
21−24
+23.5%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 12−14
−25%
|
14−16
+25%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
−21.4%
|
30−35
+21.4%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 21−24
−17.4%
|
27−30
+17.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−23.1%
|
16−18
+23.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
−25%
|
24−27
+25%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 21−24
−22.7%
|
27−30
+22.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
−24.1%
|
35−40
+24.1%
|
| Hitman 3 | 21−24
−23.8%
|
24−27
+23.8%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 16−18
−23.5%
|
21−24
+23.5%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 14−16
−13.3%
|
16−18
+13.3%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 18−20
−16.7%
|
21−24
+16.7%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 14−16
−28.6%
|
18−20
+28.6%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 16−18
−23.5%
|
21−24
+23.5%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 12−14
−25%
|
14−16
+25%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
−21.4%
|
30−35
+21.4%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 21−24
−17.4%
|
27−30
+17.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−23.1%
|
16−18
+23.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
−25%
|
24−27
+25%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 21−24
−22.7%
|
27−30
+22.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
−24.1%
|
35−40
+24.1%
|
| Hitman 3 | 21−24
−23.8%
|
24−27
+23.8%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 16−18
−23.5%
|
21−24
+23.5%
|
| Metro Exodus | 12−14
−25%
|
14−16
+25%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 14−16
−13.3%
|
16−18
+13.3%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 18−20
−16.7%
|
21−24
+16.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
−23.5%
|
21−24
+23.5%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 14−16
−28.6%
|
18−20
+28.6%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 16−18
−23.5%
|
21−24
+23.5%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 12−14
−25%
|
14−16
+25%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
−21.4%
|
30−35
+21.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−23.1%
|
16−18
+23.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
−25%
|
24−27
+25%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 21−24
−22.7%
|
27−30
+22.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
−24.1%
|
35−40
+24.1%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
−23.5%
|
21−24
+23.5%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 14−16
−28.6%
|
18−20
+28.6%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 12−14
−25%
|
14−16
+25%
|
| Hitman 3 | 12−14
−23.1%
|
16−18
+23.1%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 14−16
−14.3%
|
16−18
+14.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 6−7
−33.3%
|
8−9
+33.3%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
−16.7%
|
7−8
+16.7%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 10−12
−18.2%
|
12−14
+18.2%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 7−8
−42.9%
|
10−11
+42.9%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
−41.7%
|
16−18
+41.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
−23.1%
|
16−18
+23.1%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 12−14
−33.3%
|
16−18
+33.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
−28.6%
|
18−20
+28.6%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
−25%
|
10−11
+25%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 3−4
−66.7%
|
5−6
+66.7%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 6−7
−16.7%
|
7−8
+16.7%
|
| Hitman 3 | 8−9
−12.5%
|
9−10
+12.5%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
−12.5%
|
9−10
+12.5%
|
| Metro Exodus | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−33.3%
|
8−9
+33.3%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
−60%
|
8−9
+60%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 7−8
−14.3%
|
8−9
+14.3%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 9−10
−22.2%
|
10−12
+22.2%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10
−44.4%
|
12−14
+44.4%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
This is how Pro 555X and GTX 750 Ti compete in popular games:
- GTX 750 Ti is 25% faster than Pro 555X in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 750 Ti is 100% faster than the Pro 555X.
All in all, in popular games:
- GTX 750 Ti is ahead in 67 tests (99%)
- there's a draw in 1 test (1%)
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 8.36 | 10.08 |
| Recency | 5 June 2017 | 18 February 2014 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 555X in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon Pro 555X is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 750 Ti is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
