Radeon RX 6400 vs Pro 5300M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 5300M with Radeon RX 6400, including specs and performance data.

Pro 5300M
2019
4 GB GDDR6, 85 Watt
13.33

RX 6400 outperforms Pro 5300M by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking361296
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data50.76
Power efficiency12.4125.55
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 14Navi 24
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date13 November 2019 (5 years ago)19 January 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$159

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280768
Core clock speed1000 MHz1923 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHz2321 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt53 Watt
Texture fill rate100.0111.4
Floating-point processing power3.2 TFLOPS3.565 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs8048
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x4
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro 5300M 13.33
RX 6400 17.11
+28.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 5300M 5955
RX 6400 7645
+28.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
−22%
100−105
+22%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−21%
75−80
+21%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
−22%
100−105
+22%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−25%
60−65
+25%
Fortnite 80−85
−22%
100−105
+22%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−23%
75−80
+23%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
−19.6%
55−60
+19.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−22.6%
65−70
+22.6%
Valorant 120−130
−25%
150−160
+25%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−21%
75−80
+21%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
−22%
100−105
+22%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
−28.2%
250−260
+28.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Dota 2 90−95
−19.6%
110−120
+19.6%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−25%
60−65
+25%
Fortnite 80−85
−22%
100−105
+22%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−23%
75−80
+23%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
−19.6%
55−60
+19.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
−27.3%
70−75
+27.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Metro Exodus 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−22.6%
65−70
+22.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−28.2%
50−55
+28.2%
Valorant 120−130
−25%
150−160
+25%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−21%
75−80
+21%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Dota 2 90−95
−19.6%
110−120
+19.6%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−25%
60−65
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−23%
75−80
+23%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−22.6%
65−70
+22.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−28.2%
50−55
+28.2%
Valorant 120−130
−25%
150−160
+25%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 80−85
−22%
100−105
+22%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−25%
35−40
+25%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
−21.5%
130−140
+21.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−17.4%
27−30
+17.4%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
−23.2%
170−180
+23.2%
Valorant 140−150
−27.5%
190−200
+27.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−25%
50−55
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−25%
45−50
+25%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
−25%
40−45
+25%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%
Valorant 75−80
−26.6%
100−105
+26.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Dota 2 50−55
−25%
65−70
+25%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−20%
30−33
+20%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.33 17.11
Recency 13 November 2019 19 January 2022
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 53 Watt

RX 6400 has a 28.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 60.4% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 5300M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5300M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 6400 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon Pro 5300M
AMD Radeon RX 6400
Radeon RX 6400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 172 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 2133 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 5300M or Radeon RX 6400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.