Radeon 760M vs Pro 5300M

Place in performance ranking	322	321
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.66	no data
Architecture	Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)	RDNA 3
GPU code name	Navi 14	Phoenix
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	13 November 2019 (4 years ago)	5 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price	$2068	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	512
Core clock speed	no data	1500 MHz
Boost clock speed	1250 MHz	2800 MHz
Number of transistors	6,400 million	25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	54 Watt (35 - 54 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	100.0	67.20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro 5300M and Radeon 760M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 5300M 15.48

Radeon 760M 15.52
+0.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro 5300M 5988

Radeon 760M 6005
+0.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

30−35

−3.3%

31
+3.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

24−27

−25%

30
+25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Battlefield 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +0%	24 +0%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Hitman 3	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −18.6%	51 +18.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Battlefield 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +33.3%	18 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +44.8%	29 −44.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Hitman 3	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +95.5%	22 −95.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −12.5%	36 +12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +39.1%	23 −39.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45

+0%

40−45

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Hitman 3	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −3.4%	30−33 +3.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −3.2%	30−35 +3.2%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −3.6%	27−30 +3.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Hitman 3	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −6.3%	16−18 +6.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

+0%

14−16

+0%

This is how Pro 5300M and Radeon 760M compete in popular games:

Radeon 760M is 3% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro 5300M is 95% faster than the Radeon 760M.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the Radeon 760M is 25% faster than the Pro 5300M.

All in all, in popular games:

Pro 5300M is ahead in 4 tests (6%)
Radeon 760M is ahead in 8 tests (11%)
there's a draw in 60 tests (83%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	15.48	15.52
Recency	13 November 2019	5 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	System Shared
Chip lithography	7 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	54 Watt