Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Radeon Pro 450

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 450 and Quadro T1200 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Pro 450
2016
2 GB GDDR5, 35 Watt
7.05

T1200 Mobile outperforms Pro 450 by a whopping 175% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking546284
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.9574.64
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameBaffinTU117
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date30 October 2016 (8 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6401024
Core clock speed800 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1425 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate32.0091.20
Floating-point processing power1.024 TFLOPS2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs4064

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1270 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth81.28 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 450 7.05
T1200 Mobile 19.40
+175%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Pro 450 4502
T1200 Mobile 14387
+220%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Pro 450 14245
T1200 Mobile 44135
+210%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Pro 450 3252
T1200 Mobile 10134
+212%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Pro 450 21533
T1200 Mobile 50827
+136%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27
−115%
58
+115%
1440p10−12
−230%
33
+230%
4K19
−326%
81
+326%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−191%
30−35
+191%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−144%
40−45
+144%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−422%
47
+422%
Battlefield 5 20−22
−225%
65−70
+225%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−191%
30−35
+191%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−306%
65
+306%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
−165%
50−55
+165%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−167%
120−130
+167%
Hitman 3 14−16
−179%
35−40
+179%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−42.9%
60
+42.9%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−175%
55−60
+175%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−179%
50−55
+179%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−146%
59
+146%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−1.9%
54
+1.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−144%
40−45
+144%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−211%
28
+211%
Battlefield 5 20−22
−225%
65−70
+225%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−191%
30−35
+191%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−269%
59
+269%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
−165%
50−55
+165%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−167%
120−130
+167%
Hitman 3 14−16
−179%
35−40
+179%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−11.9%
47
+11.9%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−245%
65−70
+245%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−179%
50−55
+179%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−83.3%
44
+83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−238%
71
+238%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+12.8%
47
−12.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−144%
40−45
+144%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−133%
21
+133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−191%
30−35
+191%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−250%
56
+250%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−167%
120−130
+167%
Hitman 3 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−162%
110−120
+162%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−171%
65−70
+171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−76.2%
37
+76.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+179%
19
−179%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−163%
50−55
+163%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−186%
20−22
+186%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−800%
18
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−413%
41
+413%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−344%
110−120
+344%
Hitman 3 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+275%
12
−275%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Hitman 3 3−4
−400%
14−16
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−368%
100−110
+368%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−400%
20−22
+400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−175%
10−12
+175%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hitman 3 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 32
+0%
32
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how Pro 450 and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 115% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 230% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 326% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 450 is 275% faster.
  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro 450 is ahead in 3 tests (4%)
  • T1200 Mobile is ahead in 49 tests (72%)
  • there's a draw in 16 tests (24%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.05 19.40
Recency 30 October 2016 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 18 Watt

T1200 Mobile has a 175.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 94.4% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 450 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 450
Radeon Pro 450
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 50 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 135 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.