GRID M40 vs Radeon Pro 450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 450 with GRID M40, including specs and performance data.

Pro 450
2016
2 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
7.06
+65.7%

Pro 450 outperforms GRID M40 by an impressive 66% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking548675
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitecturePolaris (2016−2019)Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code namePolaris 11GM107
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date27 October 2016 (7 years ago)18 May 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640384
Core clock speed800 MHz1033 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate32.0033.06
Floating-point processing power1.024 gflops0.7933 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5080 MHz5200 MHz
Memory bandwidth81.28 GB/s83.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-5.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27
+68.8%
16−18
−68.8%
4K19
+90%
10−12
−90%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Battlefield 5 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+70.4%
27−30
−70.4%
Hitman 3 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+75%
24−27
−75%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+76.7%
30−33
−76.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Battlefield 5 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+70.4%
27−30
−70.4%
Hitman 3 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+75%
24−27
−75%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+76.7%
30−33
−76.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+70.4%
27−30
−70.4%
Hitman 3 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+75%
24−27
−75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+76.7%
30−33
−76.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%
Hitman 3 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+66.7%
27−30
−66.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Hitman 3 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%

This is how Pro 450 and GRID M40 compete in popular games:

  • Pro 450 is 69% faster in 1080p
  • Pro 450 is 90% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.06 4.26
Recency 27 October 2016 18 May 2016
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 50 Watt

Pro 450 has a 65.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 months, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

GRID M40, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 50% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro 450 is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID M40 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 450 is a mobile workstation card while GRID M40 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 450
Radeon Pro 450
NVIDIA GRID M40
GRID M40

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 50 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 3 votes

Rate GRID M40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.