TITAN V vs Radeon PRO W7600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO W7600 with TITAN V, including specs and performance data.

PRO W7600
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 130 Watt
36.87

TITAN V outperforms PRO W7600 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12680
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation69.64no data
Power efficiency19.6412.29
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameNavi 33GV100
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date3 August 2023 (1 year ago)7 December 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 $2,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

PRO W7600 and TITAN V have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20485120
Core clock speedno data1200 MHz
Boost clock speed2440 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate312.3465.6
Floating-point processing powerno data14.9 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs128320
Tensor Coresno data640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit3072 Bit
Memory clock speed18 GB/s848 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s651.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.11x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.21.2
Vulkan1.3+
CUDA-7.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO W7600 36.87
TITAN V 44.38
+20.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO W7600 14226
TITAN V 17125
+20.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

1440p120−130
−26.7%
152
+26.7%
4K65−70
−26.2%
82
+26.2%

Cost per frame, $

1440p4.9919.73
4K9.2236.57

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.87 44.38
Recency 3 August 2023 7 December 2017
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 250 Watt

PRO W7600 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 92.3% lower power consumption.

TITAN V, on the other hand, has a 20.4% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The TITAN V is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO W7600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7600 is a workstation graphics card while TITAN V is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W7600
Radeon PRO W7600
NVIDIA TITAN V
TITAN V

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 3282 votes

Rate TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.