GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Radeon PRO W7500

Place in the ranking	134	138
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	100.00	14.19
Power efficiency	35.70	9.91
Architecture	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code name	Navi 33	GM200
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	3 August 2023 (1 year ago)	2 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$429	$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

PRO W7500 has 605% better value for money than GTX 980 Ti.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1792	2816
Core clock speed	1500 MHz	1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1700 MHz	1075 MHz
Number of transistors	13,300 million	8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	70 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	190.4	189.4
Floating-point processing power	12.19 TFLOPS	6.06 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	96
TMUs	112	176
Ray Tracing Cores	28	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	no data	PCI Express 3.0
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	216 mm	267 mm
Height	no data	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)	no data	600 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options	-	+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1344 MHz	7.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	172.0 GB/s	336.5 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort 2.1	Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Multi monitor support	no data	4 displays
HDMI	-	+
HDCP	-	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
G-SYNC support	-	+
Audio input for HDMI	no data	Internal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream	-	+
GeForce ShadowPlay	-	+
GPU Boost	no data	2.0
GameWorks	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.7	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	2.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.1.126
CUDA	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO W7500 36.39
+1.4%

GTX 980 Ti 35.89

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO W7500 13991
+1.4%

GTX 980 Ti 13798

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	100−110 +1%	99 −1%
1440p	50−55 −2%	51 +2%
4K	50−55 −6%	53 +6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	4.29 +52.8%	6.56 −52.8%
1440p	8.58 +48.3%	12.73 −48.3%
4K	8.58 +42.7%	12.25 −42.7%

PRO W7500 has 53% lower cost per frame in 1080p
PRO W7500 has 48% lower cost per frame in 1440p
PRO W7500 has 43% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Elden Ring	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Metro Exodus	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Valorant	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Dota 2	23 +0%	23 +0%
Elden Ring	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Fortnite	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	34 +0%	34 +0%
Metro Exodus	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	190−200 +0%	190−200 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50 +0%	50 +0%
Valorant	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	73 +0%	73 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Dota 2	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	190−200 +0%	190−200 +0%
Valorant	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Elden Ring	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
World of Tanks	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Metro Exodus	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Valorant	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Dota 2	79 +0%	79 +0%
Elden Ring	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	79 +0%	79 +0%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	79 +0%	79 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30 +0%	30 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Dota 2	132 +0%	132 +0%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Fortnite	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Valorant	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%

This is how PRO W7500 and GTX 980 Ti compete in popular games:

PRO W7500 is 1% faster in 1080p
GTX 980 Ti is 2% faster in 1440p
GTX 980 Ti is 6% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	36.39	35.89
Recency	3 August 2023	2 June 2015
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	70 Watt	250 Watt

PRO W7500 has a 1.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 257.1% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon PRO W7500 and GeForce GTX 980 Ti.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7500 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 980 Ti is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.