GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile vs Radeon Instinct MI25

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Instinct MI25 RX Vega 56 RX Vega 64 RX Vega 64 Limited Edition RX Vega 64 Liquid RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition RX Vega 64 Nano RX Vega XL RX Vega XTX Vega Frontier Edition Vega 10
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
3050 A Mobile 3050 Max-Q 3050 Mobile 3050 Mobile Refresh 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB 3050 Ti Max-Q 3050 Ti Mobile 3060 Max-Q 3060 Mobile RTX A2000 Max-Q RTX A2000 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Instinct MI25 with GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Instinct MI25
2017
16 GB HBM2, 300 Watt
12.91

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile outperforms Instinct MI25 by a whopping 104% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Instinct MI25 Instinct MI25
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile RTX 3050 Ti Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking389206
Place by popularitynot in top-10067
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameVega 10GA106
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date27 June 2017 (7 years ago)11 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40962560
Core clock speed1400 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1035 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate384.082.80
Floating-point processing power12.29 TFLOPS5.299 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs25680
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed852 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth436.2 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.2
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Instinct MI25 12.91
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 26.30
+104%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Instinct MI25 4978
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 10146
+104%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
−114%
75
+114%
1440p18−20
−122%
40
+122%
4K12−14
−117%
26
+117%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 62
+0%
62
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60
+0%
60
+0%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 59
+0%
59
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Hitman 3 80
+0%
80
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Metro Exodus 143
+0%
143
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 98
+0%
98
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 231
+0%
231
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35
+0%
35
+0%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+0%
45
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Hitman 3 77
+0%
77
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Metro Exodus 114
+0%
114
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 78
+0%
78
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 105
+0%
105
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 203
+0%
203
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 26
+0%
26
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+0%
40
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Hitman 3 67
+0%
67
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 92
+0%
92
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90
+0%
90
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
+0%
50
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 28
+0%
28
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 81
+0%
81
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 26
+0%
26
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+0%
22
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Hitman 3 46
+0%
46
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 69
+0%
69
+0%
Metro Exodus 60
+0%
60
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 61
+0%
61
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 139
+0%
139
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 56
+0%
56
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Hitman 3 20
+0%
20
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Metro Exodus 47
+0%
47
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
+0%
29
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+0%
10
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 34
+0%
34
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10
+0%
10
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 29
+0%
29
+0%

This is how Instinct MI25 and RTX 3050 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 114% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 122% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 117% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 12.91 26.30
Recency 27 June 2017 11 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 75 Watt

Instinct MI25 has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 103.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Instinct MI25 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Instinct MI25 is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
Radeon Instinct MI25
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Instinct MI25 Radeon Instinct MI25
vs
GTX 1630 GeForce GTX 1630
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
vs
GTX 1080 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
Instinct MI25 Radeon Instinct MI25
vs
GTX 1050 3 GB GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
T1000 T1000
vs
RTX 3070 TiM GeForce RTX 3070 TiM
FX 5900 XT GeForce FX 5900 XT
vs
Vega 6 Mobile Radeon Vega 6 Mobile
RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000
vs
GMA X3000 GMA X3000
ATI HD 2600 XT X2 Radeon HD 2600 XT X2
vs
RTX 4060 GeForce RTX 4060
R5 M315 Radeon R5 M315
vs
Apollo Lake GT1.5 Apollo Lake GT1.5
HD 8690M Radeon HD 8690M
vs
Lakeport Lakeport
HD 6990M Rebrand Radeon HD 6990M Rebrand
vs
RTX 4080 GeForce RTX 4080
6100 + nForce 400 GeForce 6100 + nForce 400
vs
UHD Graphics 770 Mobile UHD Graphics 770 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.7 12 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI25 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4069 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.