T1000 vs ATI Radeon IGP 320M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon IGP 320M with T1000, including specs and performance data.

ATI IGP 320M
2002
0.01

T1000 outperforms ATI IGP 320M by a whopping 198200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1522275
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data27.64
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRS100TU117
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date5 October 2002 (22 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2896
Core clock speed160 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speed160 MHz1395 MHz
Number of transistors30 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate0.1678.12
Floating-point processing powerno data2.5 TFLOPS
ROPs132
TMUs156

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI IGP 320M 0.01
T1000 19.83
+198200%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI IGP 320M 3
T1000 7648
+254833%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−157

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−197400%
3950−4000
+197400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−196567%
5900−5950
+196567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−197400%
3950−4000
+197400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−197400%
3950−4000
+197400%
Hitman 3 4−5
−197400%
7900−7950
+197400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−198025%
15850−15900
+198025%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−197400%
7900−7950
+197400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−198114%
55500−55550
+198114%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−196567%
5900−5950
+196567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−197400%
3950−4000
+197400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−197400%
3950−4000
+197400%
Hitman 3 4−5
−197400%
7900−7950
+197400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−198025%
15850−15900
+198025%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−197400%
7900−7950
+197400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−197678%
17800−17850
+197678%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−198114%
55500−55550
+198114%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−196567%
5900−5950
+196567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−197400%
3950−4000
+197400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−197400%
3950−4000
+197400%
Hitman 3 4−5
−197400%
7900−7950
+197400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−198025%
15850−15900
+198025%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−197400%
7900−7950
+197400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−197678%
17800−17850
+197678%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−198114%
55500−55550
+198114%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7
−197400%
11850−11900
+197400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−197400%
3950−4000
+197400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−197400%
3950−4000
+197400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−194900%
1950−2000
+194900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−197400%
3950−4000
+197400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 19.83
Recency 5 October 2002 6 May 2021
Chip lithography 180 nm 12 nm

T1000 has a 198200% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 18 years, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

The T1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon IGP 320M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon IGP 320M is a notebook card while T1000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon IGP 320M
Radeon IGP 320M
NVIDIA T1000
T1000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 17 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 64 votes

Rate T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.