GeForce RTX 4070 vs ATI Radeon IGP 320M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon IGP 320M with GeForce RTX 4070, including specs and performance data.

ATI IGP 320M
2002
0.01

RTX 4070 outperforms ATI IGP 320M by a whopping 700900% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking151920
Place by popularitynot in top-10034
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data59.54
Power efficiencyno data24.13
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRS100AD104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 October 2002 (22 years ago)12 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25888
Core clock speed160 MHz1920 MHz
Boost clock speed160 MHz2475 MHz
Number of transistors30 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data200 Watt
Texture fill rate0.16455.4
Floating-point processing powerno data29.15 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs1184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data240 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1313 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data504.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI IGP 320M 0.01
RTX 4070 70.10
+700900%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI IGP 320M 3
RTX 4070 26948
+898167%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−1217
1440p-0−1124
4K-0−177

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.76
1440pno data4.83
4Kno data7.78

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1963%
160−170
+1963%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−21500%
216
+21500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1963%
160−170
+1963%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−8600%
87
+8600%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−11950%
482
+11950%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−4167%
120−130
+4167%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1963%
160−170
+1963%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7000%
71
+7000%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−3020%
156
+3020%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−9300%
376
+9300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−5275%
210−220
+5275%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−4167%
120−130
+4167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−4250%
170−180
+4250%
World of Tanks 8−9
−3388%
270−280
+3388%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1963%
160−170
+1963%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6300%
64
+6300%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−2540%
130−140
+2540%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−7950%
322
+7950%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−5275%
210−220
+5275%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 170−180

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−944%
90−95
+944%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1900%
40
+1900%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−3900%
160−170
+3900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−15500%
150−160
+15500%
Valorant 4−5
−7525%
300−350
+7525%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
−873%
146
+873%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−873%
146
+873%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−873%
146
+873%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1700%
18
+1700%
Dota 2 14−16
−700900%
105150−105200
+700900%
Valorant 0−1 170−180

Full HD
Low Preset

Elden Ring 233
+0%
233
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Metro Exodus 174
+0%
174
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Dota 2 174
+0%
174
+0%
Elden Ring 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Fortnite 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 174
+0%
174
+0%
Metro Exodus 149
+0%
149
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 137
+0%
137
+0%
Elden Ring 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 137
+0%
137
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
World of Tanks 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 222
+0%
222
+0%
Metro Exodus 143
+0%
143
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Elden Ring 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Metro Exodus 65
+0%
65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 121
+0%
121
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX 4070 is 21500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 is ahead in 28 tests (47%)
  • there's a draw in 31 test (53%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 70.10
Recency 5 October 2002 12 April 2023
Chip lithography 180 nm 5 nm

RTX 4070 has a 700900% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 20 years, and a 3500% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon IGP 320M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon IGP 320M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4070 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon IGP 320M
Radeon IGP 320M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 17 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 9683 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.