GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs ATI Radeon IGP 340M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking155787
Place by popularitynot in top-10040
Power efficiencyno data27.07
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRS200AD107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 October 2002 (22 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23072
Core clock speed183 MHz1545 MHz
Boost clock speed180 MHz1890 MHz
Number of transistors30 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data115 Watt
Texture fill rate0.37181.4
Floating-point processing powerno data11.61 TFLOPS
ROPs248
TMUs296
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI IGP 340M 2
RTX 4060 Mobile 17580
+878900%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HDno data112
1440pno data63
4Kno data39

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 123
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−2800%
116
+2800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 99
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−8050%
160−170
+8050%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−2250%
94
+2250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2600%
160−170
+2600%
Valorant 24−27
−900%
240−250
+900%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
−3375%
270−280
+3375%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 84
Dota 2 7−8
−2243%
164
+2243%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−8050%
160−170
+8050%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−1800%
76
+1800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2600%
160−170
+2600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−4675%
191
+4675%
Valorant 24−27
−900%
240−250
+900%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 77
Dota 2 7−8
−2129%
156
+2129%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−8050%
160−170
+8050%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−1525%
65
+1525%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2600%
160−170
+2600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−2425%
101
+2425%
Valorant 24−27
−900%
240−250
+900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 0−1 120−130

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−407%
76
+407%
Valorant 0−1 250−260

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−6000%
60−65
+6000%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−5600%
55−60
+5600%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 195
+0%
195
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 195
+0%
195
+0%
Far Cry 5 128
+0%
128
+0%
Fortnite 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 137
+0%
137
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 146
+0%
146
+0%
Far Cry 5 129
+0%
129
+0%
Fortnite 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 125
+0%
125
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 141
+0%
141
+0%
Metro Exodus 25
+0%
25
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 125
+0%
125
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 98
+0%
98
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 85
+0%
85
+0%
Metro Exodus 59
+0%
59
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 49
+0%
49
+0%
Far Cry 5 98
+0%
98
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 44
+0%
44
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76
+0%
76
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 39
+0%
39
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 37
+0%
37
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55
+0%
55
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
+0%
19
+0%
Dota 2 126
+0%
126
+0%
Far Cry 5 40
+0%
40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 4060 Mobile is 8050% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 Mobile is ahead in 21 test (35%)
  • there's a draw in 39 tests (65%)

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 October 2002 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 180 nm 5 nm

RTX 4060 Mobile has an age advantage of 20 years, and a 3500% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon IGP 340M and GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon IGP 340M
Radeon IGP 340M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4060

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 340M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3815 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon IGP 340M or GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.