GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon HD 8550G

Place in performance ranking	1050	29
Place by popularity	not in top-100	19
Value for money	0.03	no data
Architecture	Terascale 3 (2010−2013)	Ada Lovelace
GPU code name	Richland	AD106
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	12 March 2013 (11 years ago)	May 2023 (recently)
Current price	$338	$461

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	256	4352
Core clock speed	515 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	720 MHz	2535 MHz
Number of transistors	1,303 million	35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	160 Watt
Texture fill rate	11.52	324.5

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 8550G and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	IGP	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	336 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 12-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	16 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	no data	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	no data	+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.0	6.7
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	no data	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8550G 1.06

RTX 4060 Ti 59.13
+5478%

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti outperforms Radeon HD 8550G by 5478% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD 8550G 410

RTX 4060 Ti 22893
+5484%

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti outperforms Radeon HD 8550G by 5484% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−5233%

800−850
+5233%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4
−5233%

160−170

+5233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −5456%	500−550 +5456%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −5233%	160−170 +5233%
Hitman 3	1−2 −5400%	55−60 +5400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	0−1	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −5233%	160−170 +5233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −4900%	350−400 +4900%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −5456%	500−550 +5456%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −5233%	160−170 +5233%
Hitman 3	1−2 −5400%	55−60 +5400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	0−1	0−1
Metro Exodus	1−2 −5400%	55−60 +5400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −5233%	160−170 +5233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −4900%	350−400 +4900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −5400%	220−230 +5400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −5233%	160−170 +5233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −5400%	220−230 +5400%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −5233%	160−170 +5233%
Hitman 3	3−4 −5233%	160−170 +5233%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −4900%	400−450 +4900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −5300%	270−280 +5300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −5400%	55−60 +5400%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −5400%	110−120 +5400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −5400%	55−60 +5400%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −5400%	55−60 +5400%
Hitman 3	1−2 −5400%	55−60 +5400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −4900%	350−400 +4900%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	3−4 −5233%	160−170 +5233%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −5300%	270−280 +5300%