GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics

Place in performance ranking	765	629
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.97	no data
Architecture	no data	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code name	no data	GF116
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	1 August 2013 (10 years ago)	15 March 2011 (13 years ago)
Current price	$105	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	192
Core clock speed	720 / 825 MHz	783 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	106 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	25.06
Floating-point performance	no data	601.3 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics and GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	210 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	no data	1 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	3608 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	57.73 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	no data	5.1
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	1.1
Vulkan	no data	N/A
CUDA	no data	2.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−66.7%

5−6
+66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Battlefield 5	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −83.3%	10−12 +83.3%
Hitman 3	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −80%	18−20 +80%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 −60%	16−18 +60%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Battlefield 5	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −83.3%	10−12 +83.3%
Hitman 3	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −80%	18−20 +80%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 −60%	16−18 +60%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −83.3%	10−12 +83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −80%	18−20 +80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 −60%	16−18 +60%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−100%

6−7
+100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	1−2
Far Cry 5	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Hitman 3	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−100%

6−7
+100%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	1−2
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	1−2
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	1−2
Far Cry 5	0−1	1−2
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1