UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) vs Radeon HD 8510G

Place in the ranking	1117	716
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	1.85	no data
Architecture	TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)	no data
GPU code name	Devastator	no data
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	23 May 2013 (11 years ago)	no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	32
Core clock speed	554 MHz	1250 MHz
Boost clock speed	720 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,303 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	no data
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	17.28	no data
Floating-point processing power	0.553 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	8	no data
TMUs	24	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	IGP	no data
Width	IGP	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	no data
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	no data
Memory bus width	System Shared	no data
Memory clock speed	System Shared	no data
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12_1
Shader Model	5.0	no data
OpenGL	4.4	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	N/A	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

3−4

−400%

15
+400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4
−233%

10−11

+233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Far Cry 5	0−1	7−8
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Hitman 3	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −108%	24−27 +108%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −100%	14−16 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −32.3%	40−45 +32.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Far Cry 5	0−1	7−8
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Hitman 3	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −108%	24−27 +108%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −85.7%	13 +85.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −50%	14−16 +50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −32.3%	40−45 +32.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Far Cry 5	0−1	7−8
Hitman 3	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +33.3%	9 −33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −114%	15 +114%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +66.7%	6 −66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −32.3%	40−45 +32.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

1−2

−800%

9−10
+800%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	6−7
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	3−4
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Hitman 3	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	3−4
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −633%	21−24 +633%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−133%

7−8
+133%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

0−1

2−3

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	1−2
Far Cry 5	0−1	2−3

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−100%

4−5
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Battlefield 5	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Battlefield 5	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5

2−3

+0%

2−3

+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

This is how HD 8510G and UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is 400% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 8510G is 67% faster.
in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is 800% faster.

All in all, in popular games: