RTX A3000 Mobile vs Radeon HD 8410G

Place in the ranking	1081	172
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	2.22	31.96
Architecture	TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Scrapper	GA104
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	23 May 2013 (11 years ago)	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	4096
Core clock speed	600 MHz	600 MHz
Boost clock speed	720 MHz	1230 MHz
Number of transistors	1,303 million	17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	8.640	157.4
Floating-point processing power	0.2765 TFLOPS	10.08 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	64
TMUs	12	128
Tensor Cores	no data	128
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	IGP	PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	6 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	264.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.0	6.7
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	-	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8410G 1.13

RTX A3000 Mobile 32.50
+2776%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8410G 435

RTX A3000 Mobile 12496
+2773%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	3−4 −3233%	100 +3233%
1440p	1−2 −5300%	54 +5300%
4K	1−2 −4600%	47 +4600%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −611%	60−65 +611%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2467%	77 +2467%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	90−95
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −611%	60−65 +611%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2133%	67 +2133%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −1950%	164 +1950%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −1017%	65−70 +1017%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	90−95
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −611%	60−65 +611%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1733%	55 +1733%
Dota 2	0−1	130
Far Cry 5	10−11 −750%	85 +750%
Fortnite	4−5 −3675%	150−160 +3675%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −1575%	134 +1575%
Grand Theft Auto V	0−1	124
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −1315%	180−190 +1315%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −1017%	65−70 +1017%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −1486%	110−120 +1486%
World of Tanks	24−27 −1008%	270−280 +1008%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	90−95
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −611%	60−65 +611%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1433%	46 +1433%
Dota 2	0−1	132
Far Cry 5	10−11 −790%	85−90 +790%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −1325%	114 +1325%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −1315%	180−190 +1315%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	6−7 −2817%	170−180 +2817%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	30−35
World of Tanks	6−7 −3383%	200−210 +3383%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1300%	28 +1300%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1940%	100−110 +1940%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −2500%	50−55 +2500%
Valorant	6−7 −1483%	95−100 +1483%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −227%	49 +227%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −227%	49 +227%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	3−4 −3300%	100−110 +3300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	21−24
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −227%	49 +227%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −3500%	35−40 +3500%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −600%	7 +600%
Dota 2	14−16 −413%	77 +413%
Far Cry 5	0−1	45−50
Valorant	1−2 −4700%	45−50 +4700%

Full HD
Low Preset

Elden Ring

110−120

+0%

110−120

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Metro Exodus	103 +0%	103 +0%
Valorant	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Elden Ring	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Metro Exodus	49 +0%	49 +0%
Valorant	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Valorant

130−140

+0%

130−140

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	62 +0%	62 +0%
Elden Ring	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	62 +0%	62 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	86 +0%	86 +0%
Metro Exodus	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Elden Ring	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Fortnite	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	51 +0%	51 +0%

This is how HD 8410G and RTX A3000 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX A3000 Mobile is 3233% faster in 1080p
RTX A3000 Mobile is 5300% faster in 1440p
RTX A3000 Mobile is 4600% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX A3000 Mobile is 4700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX A3000 Mobile is ahead in 35 tests (65%)
there's a draw in 19 tests (35%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.13	32.50
Recency	23 May 2013	12 April 2021
Chip lithography	32 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	70 Watt

HD 8410G has 100% lower power consumption.

RTX A3000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 2776.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A3000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8410G in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8410G is a notebook graphics card while RTX A3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.