GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL vs Radeon HD 8410G

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1139not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.26no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameScrapperNV40
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 May 2013 (12 years ago)14 April 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed600 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed720 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million222 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate8.6406.400
Floating-point processing power0.2765 TFLOPSno data
ROPs416
TMUs1216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPAGP Pro 8x
Lengthno data305 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared550 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data35.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.03.0
OpenGL4.42.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2013 14 April 2004
Chip lithography 32 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 100 Watt

HD 8410G has an age advantage of 9 years, a 306.3% more advanced lithography process, and 185.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8410G and GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8410G is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8410G
Radeon HD 8410G
NVIDIA GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL
GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon HD 8410G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8410G or GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.