Radeon RX Vega 11 vs HD 7870

Place in the ranking	403	604
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.91	no data
Power efficiency	4.77	10.86
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code name	Pitcairn	Raven
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	5 March 2012 (12 years ago)	10 May 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$349	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	704
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1251 MHz
Number of transistors	2,800 million	4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	175 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	80.00	55.04
Floating-point processing power	2.56 TFLOPS	1.761 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	8
TMUs	80	44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	IGP
Length	241 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	256 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1200 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	153.6 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort	Motherboard Dependent
Eyefinity	+	-
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7 (6.4)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7870 12.02
+120%

RX Vega 11 5.47

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7870 4637
+120%

RX Vega 11 2112

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7870 6194
+13%

RX Vega 11 5483

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	84 +140%	35−40 −140%
Full HD	68 +172%	25 −172%
1440p	12−14 +100%	6 −100%
4K	24−27 +118%	11 −118%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	5.13	no data
1440p	29.08	no data
4K	14.54	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

18−20
+111%

9−10

−111%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +40%	20 −40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +217%	6−7 −217%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +65.2%	23 −65.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +100%	12−14 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +111%	9−10 −111%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +27.3%	22 −27.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 +32%	25 −32%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −11.3%	89 +11.3%
Hitman 3	21−24 +109%	10−12 −109%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +88.2%	30−35 −88.2%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +21.2%	33 −21.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +120%	14−16 −120%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +2.6%	38 −2.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +43.8%	45−50 −43.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −25%	35 +25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +217%	6−7 −217%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +153%	14−16 −153%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +100%	12−14 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +111%	9−10 −111%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +47.4%	19 −47.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 +73.7%	19 −73.7%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +2.6%	78 −2.6%
Hitman 3	21−24 +109%	10−12 −109%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +88.2%	30−35 −88.2%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +233%	12 −233%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +120%	14−16 −120%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +129%	17 −129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 +57.9%	18−20 −57.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +43.8%	45−50 −43.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +155%	11 −155%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +217%	6−7 −217%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +100%	12−14 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +111%	9−10 −111%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +100%	14 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +176%	29 −176%
Hitman 3	21−24 +109%	10−12 −109%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +88.2%	30−35 −88.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +160%	15 −160%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20 +100%	10 −100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +43.8%	45−50 −43.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35
+120%

14−16

−120%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +130%	10−11 −130%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +125%	8−9 −125%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +160%	5−6 −160%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +314%	14−16 −314%
Hitman 3	14−16 +66.7%	9−10 −66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +108%	12−14 −108%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +375%	4−5 −375%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 +114%	35−40 −114%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

20−22
+100%

10−11

−100%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Hitman 3	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +409%	10−12 −409%
Metro Exodus	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 +40%	5 −40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3	0−1
Far Cry 5	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +33.3%	12 −33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−12
+83.3%

6−7

−83.3%

This is how HD 7870 and RX Vega 11 compete in popular games:

HD 7870 is 140% faster in 900p
HD 7870 is 172% faster in 1080p
HD 7870 is 100% faster in 1440p
HD 7870 is 118% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 7870 is 700% faster.
in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX Vega 11 is 25% faster.

All in all, in popular games: