GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon HD 7850

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7850 with GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

HD 7850
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 130 Watt
10.00

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q outperforms HD 7850 by a whopping 128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking417227
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.4516.08
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code namePitcairnN18E-G0
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date5 March 2012 (12 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 $229
Current price$267 (1.1x MSRP)$1037 (4.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has 1009% better value for money than HD 7850.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10241536
Core clock speedno data1140 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1335 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate55.04128.2
Floating-point performance1,761 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 7850 and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth153.6 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity1no data
HDMI+no data
DisplayPort support-no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D-no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
ZeroCore-no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
Mantle-no data
CUDAno data7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7850 10.00
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 22.82
+128%

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q outperforms Radeon HD 7850 by 128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD 7850 3860
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 8814
+128%

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q outperforms Radeon HD 7850 by 128% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD 7850 5210
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 13355
+156%

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q outperforms Radeon HD 7850 by 156% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
−131%
81
+131%
4K14−16
−129%
32
+129%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−131%
35−40
+131%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−133%
56
+133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−144%
35−40
+144%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−151%
88
+151%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
−133%
70
+133%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−131%
35−40
+131%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−130%
92
+130%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−150%
60−65
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−153%
100−110
+153%
Hitman 3 18−20
−156%
45−50
+156%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−136%
130
+136%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−140%
120
+140%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−130%
92
+130%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
−157%
75−80
+157%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−144%
65−70
+144%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−143%
51
+143%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−144%
35−40
+144%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−140%
84
+140%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−144%
66
+144%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−131%
35−40
+131%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−157%
77
+157%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−150%
60−65
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−153%
100−110
+153%
Hitman 3 18−20
−156%
45−50
+156%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−157%
90−95
+157%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−146%
86
+146%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
−160%
78
+160%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
−157%
75−80
+157%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−130%
92
+130%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−144%
65−70
+144%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−133%
42
+133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−144%
35−40
+144%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−138%
50
+138%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−131%
35−40
+131%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−157%
54
+157%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−153%
100−110
+153%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−163%
79
+163%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
−157%
75−80
+157%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−143%
51
+143%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−144%
65−70
+144%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
−140%
72
+140%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−139%
40−45
+139%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−161%
45−50
+161%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−144%
21−24
+144%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−144%
35−40
+144%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
Hitman 3 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−161%
45−50
+161%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−139%
40−45
+139%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−133%
45−50
+133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−138%
35−40
+138%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−144%
21−24
+144%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Hitman 3 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−160%
24−27
+160%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−158%
31
+158%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−158%
30−35
+158%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−160%
24−27
+160%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−144%
21−24
+144%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−150%
20−22
+150%

This is how HD 7850 and GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is 131% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is 129% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.00 22.82
Recency 5 March 2012 23 April 2019
Cost $249 $229
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 60 Watt

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7850 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7850 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7850
Radeon HD 7850
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 785 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 492 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.