Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) vs HD 7770

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7770 with Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema), including specs and performance data.

HD 7770
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 80 Watt
5.62
+569%

HD 7770 outperforms R3 (Mullins/Beema) by a whopping 569% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking5691100
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.39no data
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)GCN 1.1 (2014)
GPU code nameCape VerdeBeema/Mullins
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date15 February 2012 (12 years ago)29 April 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$129.99 no data
Current price$300 (2.3x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640128
Core clock speed1000 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data686 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Wattno data
Texture fill rate40.00no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 7770 and Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed4500 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth72 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPortno data
Eyefinity+no data
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (FL 12_0)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7770 5.62
+569%
R3 (Mullins/Beema) 0.84

HD 7770 outperforms R3 (Mullins/Beema) by 569% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD 7770 3098
+400%
R3 (Mullins/Beema) 620

HD 7770 outperforms R3 (Mullins/Beema) by 400% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD 7770 14073
+676%
R3 (Mullins/Beema) 1815

HD 7770 outperforms R3 (Mullins/Beema) by 676% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD 7770 2825
+573%
R3 (Mullins/Beema) 420

HD 7770 outperforms R3 (Mullins/Beema) by 573% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD 7770 18782
+516%
R3 (Mullins/Beema) 3049

HD 7770 outperforms R3 (Mullins/Beema) by 516% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p47
+571%
7−8
−571%
Full HD51
+240%
15
−240%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7 0−1
Battlefield 5 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Far Cry 5 12−14 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18 no data
Forza Horizon 4 27−30 no data
Hitman 3 10−12 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30 no data
Metro Exodus 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7 0−1
Battlefield 5 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Far Cry 5 12−14 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18 no data
Forza Horizon 4 27−30 no data
Hitman 3 10−12 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30 no data
Metro Exodus 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Far Cry 5 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 4 27−30 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Far Cry 5 9−10 no data
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Hitman 3 10−11 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14 no data
Metro Exodus 4−5 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5 no data
Hitman 3 2−3 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 no data
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7 no data
Metro Exodus 7−8 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 no data

This is how HD 7770 and R3 (Mullins/Beema) compete in popular games:

  • HD 7770 is 571% faster in 900p
  • HD 7770 is 240% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.62 0.84
Recency 15 February 2012 29 April 2014

The Radeon HD 7770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7770 is a desktop card while Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7770
Radeon HD 7770
AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)
Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 905 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 28 votes

Rate Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.