Quadro K510M vs Radeon HD 7770

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7770 with Quadro K510M, including specs and performance data.

HD 7770
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 80 Watt
5.63
+239%

HD 7770 outperforms K510M by a whopping 239% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking598941
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.33no data
Power efficiency4.913.86
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameCape VerdeGK208
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date15 February 2012 (12 years ago)23 July 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640192
Core clock speed1000 MHz846 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million915 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate40.0013.54
Floating-point processing power1.28 TFLOPS0.3249 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs4016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz600 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s19.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-
Display Portno data1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131+
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7770 5.63
+239%
Quadro K510M 1.66

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7770 2173
+239%
Quadro K510M 641

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p47
+292%
12−14
−292%
Full HD46
+283%
12−14
−283%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.46no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Battlefield 5 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+620%
5−6
−620%
Hitman 3 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+119%
16−18
−119%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+41.2%
30−35
−41.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Battlefield 5 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+620%
5−6
−620%
Hitman 3 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+119%
16−18
−119%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+41.2%
30−35
−41.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+620%
5−6
−620%
Hitman 3 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+119%
16−18
−119%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+41.2%
30−35
−41.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Hitman 3 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+300%
9−10
−300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Hitman 3 2−3 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%

This is how HD 7770 and Quadro K510M compete in popular games:

  • HD 7770 is 292% faster in 900p
  • HD 7770 is 283% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the HD 7770 is 620% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, HD 7770 surpassed Quadro K510M in all 51 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.63 1.66
Recency 15 February 2012 23 July 2013
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 30 Watt

HD 7770 has a 239.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Quadro K510M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 166.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 7770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K510M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7770 is a desktop card while Quadro K510M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7770
Radeon HD 7770
NVIDIA Quadro K510M
Quadro K510M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 938 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Quadro K510M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.