Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Radeon HD 7660G

Place in performance ranking	1009	263
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.01	no data
Architecture	Terascale 3 (2010−2013)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Trinity	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	15 May 2012 (11 years ago)	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price	$950	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	1024
Core clock speed	497 MHz	855 MHz
Boost clock speed	686 MHz	1425 MHz
Number of transistors	1.3 Million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	16.46	91.20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 7660G and Quadro T1200 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Interface	IGP	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	4 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.6
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7660G 1.22

T1200 Mobile 19.93
+1534%

Quadro T1200 Mobile outperforms Radeon HD 7660G by 1534% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD 7660G 4523

T1200 Mobile 44135
+876%

Quadro T1200 Mobile outperforms Radeon HD 7660G by 876% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD 7660G 1057

T1200 Mobile 14387
+1261%

Quadro T1200 Mobile outperforms Radeon HD 7660G by 1261% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD 7660G 6409

T1200 Mobile 50827
+693%

Quadro T1200 Mobile outperforms Radeon HD 7660G by 693% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	10 −1500%	160−170 +1500%
Full HD	15 −287%	58 +287%
1200p	9 −1456%	140−150 +1456%
1440p	2−3 −1550%	33 +1550%
4K	4−5 −1925%	81 +1925%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−967%

30−35
+967%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −478%	50−55 +478%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −967%	30−35 +967%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	65−70
Hitman 3	1−2 −5700%	55−60 +5700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −5900%	60 +5900%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −1000%	30−35 +1000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −743%	59 +743%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −478%	50−55 +478%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −967%	30−35 +967%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	65−70
Hitman 3	1−2 −5700%	55−60 +5700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −4600%	47 +4600%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −1500%	30−35 +1500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −1000%	30−35 +1000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −529%	44 +529%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −1675%	71 +1675%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −967%	30−35 +967%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	65−70
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −825%	37 +825%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Hitman 3	4−5 −700%	30−35 +700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −300%	32 +300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −420%	24−27 +420%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −1950%	41 +1950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −1400%	14−16 +1400%
Hitman 3	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −85.7%	12−14 +85.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	10−12

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	12−14
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	10−11
Far Cry 5	3−4 −433%	16−18 +433%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −280%	18−20 +280%

This is how HD 7660G and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

T1200 Mobile is 1500% faster than HD 7660G in 900p
T1200 Mobile is 287% faster than HD 7660G in 1080p
T1200 Mobile is 1456% faster than HD 7660G in 1200p
T1200 Mobile is 1550% faster than HD 7660G in 1440p
T1200 Mobile is 1925% faster than HD 7660G in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 5900% faster than the HD 7660G.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, T1200 Mobile surpassed HD 7660G in all 28 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.22	19.93
Recency	15 May 2012	12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	4 GB
Chip lithography	32 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	95 Watt