Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics
Aggregate performance score
Iris Xe MAX Graphics outperforms Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics by a whopping 844% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 1013 | 386 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.13 | no data |
| Architecture | Terascale 3 (2010−2013) | Gen. 12 Xe (2020) |
| GPU code name | no data | iDG1LPDEV |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 15 May 2012 (12 years ago) | 31 October 2020 (3 years ago) |
| Current price | $105 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 736 | 96 |
| Core clock speed | 655 / 600 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1650 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 25 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 79.20 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics and Iris Xe MAX Graphics compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | LPDDR4x |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 68.26 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | no data | 1.2 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 2−3
−1200%
| 26
+1200%
|
| 1440p | 2−3
−900%
| 20
+900%
|
| 4K | 1−2
−1500%
| 16
+1500%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−500%
|
18−20
+500%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−733%
|
24−27
+733%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−500%
|
18−20
+500%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−450%
|
30−35
+450%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−680%
|
35−40
+680%
|
| Hitman 3 | 4−5
−725%
|
33
+725%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14
−300%
|
48
+300%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−1550%
|
33
+1550%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9−10
−333%
|
39
+333%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−733%
|
24−27
+733%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−500%
|
18−20
+500%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−383%
|
29
+383%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−680%
|
35−40
+680%
|
| Hitman 3 | 4−5
−200%
|
12
+200%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14
−217%
|
38
+217%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−1400%
|
30
+1400%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9−10
−88.9%
|
17
+88.9%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−750%
|
34
+750%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−733%
|
24−27
+733%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−500%
|
18−20
+500%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−450%
|
30−35
+450%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−680%
|
35−40
+680%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14
−117%
|
26
+117%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−350%
|
18
+350%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−1150%
|
25
+1150%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−2100%
|
21−24
+2100%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
−1900%
|
20−22
+1900%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5
−250%
|
14−16
+250%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−500%
|
6−7
+500%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−800%
|
18−20
+800%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−2000%
|
21−24
+2000%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 4−5
−475%
|
21−24
+475%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−1000%
|
10−12
+1000%
|
4K
High Preset
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−333%
|
24−27
+333%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
−1100%
|
12−14
+1100%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
−1100%
|
12−14
+1100%
|
| Metro Exodus | 4−5
−175%
|
10−12
+175%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−267%
|
10−12
+267%
|
This is how HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics and Iris Xe MAX Graphics compete in popular games:
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 1200% faster in 1080p
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 900% faster in 1440p
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 1500% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 2100% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, Iris Xe MAX Graphics surpassed HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics in all 38 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.21 | 11.42 |
| Recency | 15 May 2012 | 31 October 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 10 nm |
The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
