UHD Graphics 605 vs Radeon HD 7350 PCI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1072
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Gen. 9 Apollo Lake (2016−2017)
GPU code nameCedarGemini Lake
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date5 January 2012 (12 years ago)11 December 2017 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8018
Core clock speed650 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data750 MHz
Number of transistors292 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt5 Watt
Texture fill rate5.20014.40
Floating-point processing powerno data0.2304 gflops
ROPs43
TMUs818

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 3.0 x1
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR4 / LPDDR4
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.1.103

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 January 2012 11 December 2017
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 5 Watt

UHD Graphics 605 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 280% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7350 PCI and UHD Graphics 605. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7350 PCI is a desktop card while UHD Graphics 605 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7350 PCI
Radeon HD 7350 PCI
Intel UHD Graphics 605
UHD Graphics 605

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 44 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7350 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 785 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 605 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.