GMA X3000 vs Radeon HD 7750

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking667not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.16no data
Power efficiency5.59no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameCape VerdeBroadwater
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date15 February 2012 (12 years ago)1 June 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speedno data500 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate25.604.000
Floating-point processing power0.8192 TFLOPSno data
ROPs161
TMUs328

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1125 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth72 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 119.0c
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 February 2012 1 June 2006
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 13 Watt

HD 7750 has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

GMA X3000, on the other hand, has 476.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7750 and GMA X3000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7750 is a desktop card while GMA X3000 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7750
Radeon HD 7750
Intel GMA X3000
GMA X3000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 539 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 28 votes

Rate GMA X3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.