ATI Mobility Radeon vs HD 6990M Crossfire
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire with Mobility Radeon, including specs and performance data.
HD 6990M Crossfire outperforms ATI Mobility by a whopping 654% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 439 | 1026 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | Terascale 2 (2009−2015) | Rage 6 (2000−2007) |
GPU code name | Blackcomb XTX | M6 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 12 July 2011 (13 years ago) | 1 December 2001 (22 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2240 | no data |
Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 144 MHz |
Number of transistors | 2x1700 Million | 30 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 180 nm |
Texture fill rate | no data | 0.43 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | large | no data |
Interface | no data | AGP 4x |
Width | no data | IGP |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |
Maximum RAM amount | 2x2 GB | 16 MB |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 288 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | no data | 2.304 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11 | 7.0 |
OpenGL | no data | 1.3 |
OpenCL | no data | N/A |
Vulkan | - | N/A |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 110
+686%
| 14−16
−686%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
+1400%
|
1−2
−1400%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 24−27
+700%
|
3−4
−700%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 14−16
+1400%
|
1−2
−1400%
|
Battlefield 5 | 30−35
+675%
|
4−5
−675%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 20−22
+900%
|
2−3
−900%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
+1400%
|
1−2
−1400%
|
Far Cry 5 | 21−24
+667%
|
3−4
−667%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 27−30
+800%
|
3−4
−800%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70
+713%
|
8−9
−713%
|
Hitman 3 | 18−20
+850%
|
2−3
−850%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 50−55
+671%
|
7−8
−671%
|
Metro Exodus | 30−35
+675%
|
4−5
−675%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 27−30
+800%
|
3−4
−800%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 30−35
+700%
|
4−5
−700%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 60−65
+688%
|
8−9
−688%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 24−27
+700%
|
3−4
−700%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 14−16
+1400%
|
1−2
−1400%
|
Battlefield 5 | 30−35
+675%
|
4−5
−675%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 20−22
+900%
|
2−3
−900%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
+1400%
|
1−2
−1400%
|
Far Cry 5 | 21−24
+667%
|
3−4
−667%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 27−30
+800%
|
3−4
−800%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70
+713%
|
8−9
−713%
|
Hitman 3 | 18−20
+850%
|
2−3
−850%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 50−55
+671%
|
7−8
−671%
|
Metro Exodus | 30−35
+675%
|
4−5
−675%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 27−30
+800%
|
3−4
−800%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 30−35
+700%
|
4−5
−700%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+767%
|
3−4
−767%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 60−65
+688%
|
8−9
−688%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 24−27
+700%
|
3−4
−700%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 14−16
+1400%
|
1−2
−1400%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 20−22
+900%
|
2−3
−900%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
+1400%
|
1−2
−1400%
|
Far Cry 5 | 21−24
+667%
|
3−4
−667%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70
+713%
|
8−9
−713%
|
Hitman 3 | 18−20
+850%
|
2−3
−850%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 50−55
+671%
|
7−8
−671%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 30−35
+700%
|
4−5
−700%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+767%
|
3−4
−767%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 60−65
+688%
|
8−9
−688%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 27−30
+800%
|
3−4
−800%
|
1440p
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 18−20
+850%
|
2−3
−850%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 14−16
+1400%
|
1−2
−1400%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 10−11
+900%
|
1−2
−900%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 6−7 | 0−1 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−11
+900%
|
1−2
−900%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 10−12
+1000%
|
1−2
−1000%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+760%
|
5−6
−760%
|
Hitman 3 | 12−14
+1200%
|
1−2
−1200%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 20−22
+900%
|
2−3
−900%
|
Metro Exodus | 14−16
+1300%
|
1−2
−1300%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 12−14
+1100%
|
1−2
−1100%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10
+800%
|
1−2
−800%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 60−65
+675%
|
8−9
−675%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 16−18
+700%
|
2−3
−700%
|
4K
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 9−10
+800%
|
1−2
−800%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 7−8 | 0−1 |
Hitman 3 | 6−7 | 0−1 |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 40−45
+740%
|
5−6
−740%
|
Metro Exodus | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 6−7 | 0−1 |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 4−5 | 0−1 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5 | 0−1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
+1100%
|
1−2
−1100%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7 | 0−1 |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10
+800%
|
1−2
−800%
|
This is how HD 6990M Crossfire and ATI Mobility compete in popular games:
- HD 6990M Crossfire is 686% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 10.10 | 1.34 |
Recency | 12 July 2011 | 1 December 2001 |
Chip lithography | 40 nm | 180 nm |
HD 6990M Crossfire has a 653.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is a notebook card while Mobility Radeon is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.