UHD Graphics 750 vs Radeon HD 6870

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

HD 6870
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 151 Watt
5.75
+28.1%

Radeon HD 6870 outperforms UHD Graphics 750 by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking564624
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.372.10
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameRV940 BartsRocket Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date22 October 2010 (13 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$239 no data
Current price$332 (1.4x MSRP)$1454

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

UHD Graphics 750 has 468% better value for money than HD 6870.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1120256
Boost clock speed900 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors1,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)151 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate50.4020.80
Floating-point performance2,016.0 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 6870 and UHD Graphics 750 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCIe 2.0 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus
Length220 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1050 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth134.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity1no data
HDMI+no data
DisplayPort support-no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
HD3D-no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
ZeroCore-no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1112 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkanno data1.2
Mantle-no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6870 5.75
+28.1%
UHD Graphics 750 4.49

Radeon HD 6870 outperforms UHD Graphics 750 by 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD 6870 2219
+28%
UHD Graphics 750 1733

Radeon HD 6870 outperforms UHD Graphics 750 by 28% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p57
+42.5%
40−45
−42.5%
Full HD66
+32%
50−55
−32%
1200p39
+30%
30−35
−30%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Hitman 3 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Hitman 3 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Hitman 3 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Hitman 3 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

This is how HD 6870 and UHD Graphics 750 compete in popular games:

  • HD 6870 is 43% faster in 900p
  • HD 6870 is 32% faster in 1080p
  • HD 6870 is 30% faster in 1200p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 6870 is 300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 6870 is ahead in 60 tests (95%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.75 4.49
Recency 22 October 2010 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 151 Watt 15 Watt

The Radeon HD 6870 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 750 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6870 is a desktop card while UHD Graphics 750 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6870
Radeon HD 6870
Intel UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 329 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 355 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.