Radeon 610M vs HD 6755G2
Aggregated performance score
610M outperforms HD 6755G2 by a whopping 101% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 952 | 751 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 45 |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 (2009−2015) | RDNA 2 (2020−2022) |
| GPU code name | no data | RDNA 2 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 14 June 2011 (12 years ago) | 20 September 2022 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 880 | 128 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 400 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2200 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 15.20 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Radeon HD 6755G2 and Radeon 610M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | no data | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | no data | System Shared |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | Portable Device Dependent |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | no data | 1.3 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
610M outperforms HD 6755G2 by 101% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
610M outperforms HD 6755G2 by 174% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
610M outperforms HD 6755G2 by 56% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| 900p | 20
−100%
| 40−45
+100%
|
| Full HD | 14
+7.7%
| 13
−7.7%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−11
−20%
|
12−14
+20%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−600%
|
7−8
+600%
|
| Hitman 3 | 2−3
−150%
|
5−6
+150%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
−100%
|
14
+100%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−11
−20%
|
12−14
+20%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−600%
|
7−8
+600%
|
| Hitman 3 | 2−3
−150%
|
5−6
+150%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
| Metro Exodus | 2−3
−350%
|
9
+350%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
−71.4%
|
12
+71.4%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−175%
|
11
+175%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−600%
|
7−8
+600%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−75%
|
7
+75%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−66.7%
|
5−6
+66.7%
|
| Hitman 3 | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
−12.5%
|
9−10
+12.5%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Hitman 3 | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
This is how HD 6755G2 and Radeon 610M compete in popular games:
- Radeon 610M is 100% faster in 900p
- HD 6755G2 is 8% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 610M is 600% faster than the HD 6755G2.
All in all, in popular games:
- Radeon 610M is ahead in 29 tests (91%)
- there's a draw in 3 tests (9%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.42 | 2.85 |
| Recency | 14 June 2011 | 20 September 2022 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 6 nm |
The Radeon 610M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6755G2 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
