Radeon 620 vs HD 6620G

Place in the ranking	1124	848
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	1.75	3.23
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code name	Sumo	Polaris 24
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	7 December 2011 (12 years ago)	13 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	400	384
Core clock speed	444 MHz	730 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1024 MHz
Number of transistors	1,178 million	1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	8.880	24.58
Floating-point processing power	0.3552 TFLOPS	0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	20	24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	IGP	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	2 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	900 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	5.0	6.3
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6620G 0.88

Radeon 620 2.32
+164%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6620G 341

Radeon 620 894
+162%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−131%

30−35
+131%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−66.7%

5−6
+66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	0−1	4−5
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −200%	6−7 +200%
Hitman 3	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −58.3%	18−20 +58.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −57.1%	10−12 +57.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −19.4%	35−40 +19.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	0−1	4−5
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −200%	6−7 +200%
Hitman 3	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −58.3%	18−20 +58.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −57.1%	10−12 +57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −30%	12−14 +30%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −19.4%	35−40 +19.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	0−1	4−5
Hitman 3	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −58.3%	18−20 +58.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −57.1%	10−12 +57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −30%	12−14 +30%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −19.4%	35−40 +19.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

1−2

−400%

5−6
+400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	4−5
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	2−3
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Hitman 3	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	1−2
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −333%	12−14 +333%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−66.7%

5−6
+66.7%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

0−1

1−2

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	1−2
Far Cry 5	0−1	1−2

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−50%

3−4
+50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4

10−12

+0%

10−12

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5

0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

This is how HD 6620G and Radeon 620 compete in popular games:

Radeon 620 is 131% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 620 is 400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Radeon 620 is ahead in 36 tests (77%)
there's a draw in 11 tests (23%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.88	2.32
Recency	7 December 2011	13 May 2019
Chip lithography	32 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	50 Watt

HD 6620G has 42.9% lower power consumption.

Radeon 620, on the other hand, has a 163.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 620 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6620G in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.