RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Radeon HD 6570M
Aggregated performance score
RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms Radeon HD 6570M by a whopping 3196% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 964 | 66 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.06 | no data |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 (2009−2015) | Ada Lovelace |
| GPU code name | Capilano | AD107 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 26 November 2010 (13 years ago) | 12 February 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $649 |
| Current price | $338 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 400 | 2816 |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2130 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 627 million | 18,900 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 13.00 | 187.4 |
| Floating-point performance | 520.0 gflops | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Radeon HD 6570M and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Length | no data | 168 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 16 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | 256.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| CUDA | no data | 8.9 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 24
−3025%
| 750−800
+3025%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−3150%
|
130−140
+3150%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10
−3122%
|
290−300
+3122%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−3150%
|
130−140
+3150%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
| Hitman 3 | 2−3
−3150%
|
65−70
+3150%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−3150%
|
130−140
+3150%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
−3186%
|
230−240
+3186%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10
−3122%
|
290−300
+3122%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−3150%
|
130−140
+3150%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
| Hitman 3 | 2−3
−3150%
|
65−70
+3150%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
| Metro Exodus | 2−3
−3150%
|
65−70
+3150%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−3150%
|
130−140
+3150%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
−3186%
|
230−240
+3186%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−3150%
|
130−140
+3150%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−3150%
|
130−140
+3150%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−3150%
|
130−140
+3150%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−3067%
|
95−100
+3067%
|
| Hitman 3 | 4−5
−3150%
|
130−140
+3150%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
−3150%
|
260−270
+3150%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5−6
−3100%
|
160−170
+3100%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−3150%
|
65−70
+3150%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
−3150%
|
65−70
+3150%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
−3150%
|
65−70
+3150%
|
| Hitman 3 | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 7−8
−3186%
|
230−240
+3186%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−3067%
|
95−100
+3067%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
−3100%
|
160−170
+3100%
|
This is how HD 6570M and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:
- RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 3025% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.38 | 45.48 |
| Recency | 26 November 2010 | 12 February 2024 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 16 GB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 70 Watt |
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6570M in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon HD 6570M is a notebook card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
