T1000 vs Radeon HD 6530M

Place in performance ranking	998	262
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.05	39.18
Architecture	Terascale 2 (2009−2015)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Capilano-LP	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	26 November 2010 (13 years ago)	6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price	$338	$119

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

T1000 has 78260% better value for money than HD 6530M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	400	896
Core clock speed	500 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	1395 MHz
Number of transistors	627 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	26 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	9.000	78.12
Floating-point performance	400.0 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 6530M and T1000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	MXM-II	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	10 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.6
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	no data	7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−1400%

45−50
+1400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −1400%	45−50 +1400%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1400%	45−50 +1400%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −1400%	90−95 +1400%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −1400%	75−80 +1400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −1400%	60−65 +1400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −1438%	200−210 +1438%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −1344%	130−140 +1344%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −1400%	45−50 +1400%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1400%	45−50 +1400%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −1400%	90−95 +1400%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −1400%	75−80 +1400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −1400%	60−65 +1400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −1438%	200−210 +1438%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −1344%	130−140 +1344%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −1400%	60−65 +1400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −1400%	45−50 +1400%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1400%	45−50 +1400%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −1400%	90−95 +1400%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −1400%	75−80 +1400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −1438%	200−210 +1438%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −1400%	60−65 +1400%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−1400%

30−33
+1400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −1400%	60−65 +1400%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −1400%	75−80 +1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	6−7 −1400%	90−95 +1400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −1400%	60−65 +1400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−1400%

45−50
+1400%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.28	19.85
Recency	26 November 2010	6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	26 Watt	50 Watt