GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon HD 6530M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6530M with GeForce RTX 3070, including specs and performance data.

HD 6530M
2010
1 GB DDR3, 26 Watt
1.28

RTX 3070 outperforms HD 6530M by a whopping 4429% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking102739
Place by popularitynot in top-10038
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data59.33
Power efficiency3.4118.25
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameCapilanoGA104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date26 November 2010 (13 years ago)1 September 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4005888
Core clock speed450 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1725 MHz
Number of transistors627 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)26 Watt220 Watt
Texture fill rate9.000317.4
Floating-point processing power0.36 TFLOPS20.31 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs20184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-8.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6530M 1.28
RTX 3070 57.97
+4429%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 6530M 3334
RTX 3070 88744
+2562%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−4833%
148
+4833%
1440p2−3
−4950%
101
+4950%
4K1−2
−6300%
64
+6300%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.37
1440pno data4.94
4Kno data7.80

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3575%
147
+3575%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1983%
125
+1983%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2625%
100−110
+2625%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3375%
139
+3375%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−10900%
110−120
+10900%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−4567%
140−150
+4567%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−11100%
220−230
+11100%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1717%
109
+1717%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1471%
220−230
+1471%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−5800%
118
+5800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−2813%
230−240
+2813%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−427%
174
+427%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1900%
120−130
+1900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2625%
100−110
+2625%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3050%
126
+3050%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−10900%
110−120
+10900%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−4567%
140−150
+4567%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−11100%
220−230
+11100%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1833%
116
+1833%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1471%
220−230
+1471%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−5600%
110−120
+5600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−3088%
255
+3088%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−1000%
120−130
+1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−439%
178
+439%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1250%
81
+1250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2625%
100−110
+2625%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2450%
102
+2450%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−10900%
110−120
+10900%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−11100%
220−230
+11100%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1750%
111
+1750%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1193%
181
+1193%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−2688%
223
+2688%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−1000%
121
+1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−158%
85
+158%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−5700%
116
+5700%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−12400%
120−130
+12400%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−6700%
68
+6700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 65−70
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6100%
62
+6100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−6700%
65−70
+6700%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1271%
96
+1271%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−3550%
146
+3550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 95−100
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−2817%
175
+2817%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2750%
114
+2750%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 55−60

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−4700%
48
+4700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−4200%
43
+4200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 40−45
Far Cry 5 0−1 35−40

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2200%
69
+2200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100
+0%
100
+0%
Battlefield 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 87
+0%
87
+0%
Battlefield 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 78
+0%
78
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65
+0%
65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Metro Exodus 101
+0%
101
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 166
+0%
166
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hitman 3 52
+0%
52
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Metro Exodus 107
+0%
107
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90
+0%
90
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 97
+0%
97
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 38
+0%
38
+0%

This is how HD 6530M and RTX 3070 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 is 4833% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3070 is 4950% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3070 is 6300% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3070 is 12400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 is ahead in 47 tests (70%)
  • there's a draw in 20 tests (30%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.28 57.97
Recency 26 November 2010 1 September 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 26 Watt 220 Watt

HD 6530M has 746.2% lower power consumption.

RTX 3070, on the other hand, has a 4428.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3070 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6530M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6530M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3070 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6530M
Radeon HD 6530M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 6530M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 10895 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.