UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) vs Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 with UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU), including specs and performance data.

HD 6450 GDDR5
2011
1 GB GDDR5, 27 Watt
0.96

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) outperforms HD 6450 GDDR5 by a whopping 108% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1116890
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.4813.95
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Gen. 11 (2021)
GPU code nameCaicosGen. 11
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 April 2011 (13 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16032
Core clock speed750 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data900 MHz
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt4.8 - 10 Watt

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed900 MHzno data
Shared memory-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112_1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6450 GDDR5 0.96
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 2.00
+108%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 6450 GDDR5 623
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 1589
+155%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 6450 GDDR5 2822
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 6317
+124%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 6450 GDDR5 464
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 1016
+119%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD 6450 GDDR5 4257
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 6977
+63.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p7
−100%
14−16
+100%
Full HD15
+87.5%
8
−87.5%
1200p5
−100%
10−12
+100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Hitman 3 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−30.8%
16−18
+30.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−9.4%
35−40
+9.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Hitman 3 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−30.8%
16−18
+30.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−28.6%
9
+28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−9.4%
35−40
+9.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Hitman 3 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+117%
6
−117%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−85.7%
13
+85.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+233%
3
−233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−9.4%
35−40
+9.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Hitman 3 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 1−2
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−175%
10−12
+175%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 1−2

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 1−2
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 1−2

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

This is how HD 6450 GDDR5 and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is 100% faster in 900p
  • HD 6450 GDDR5 is 88% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is 100% faster in 1200p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 6450 GDDR5 is 233% faster.
  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is 300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 6450 GDDR5 is ahead in 2 tests (4%)
  • UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is ahead in 39 tests (80%)
  • there's a draw in 8 tests (16%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.96 2.00
Recency 18 April 2011 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 4 Watt

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) has a 108.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 575% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 is a desktop card while UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5
Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 24 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 19 votes

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.