Radeon Pro 5500M vs HD 5670

Place in performance ranking	830	291
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.10	4.65
Architecture	Terascale 2 (2009−2015)	Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code name	Redwood	Navi 14
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	14 January 2010 (14 years ago)	13 November 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$119	no data
Current price	$132 (1.1x MSRP)	$1950

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro 5500M has 4550% better value for money than ATI HD 5670.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	400	1536
Core clock speed	775 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	1300 MHz
Number of transistors	627 million	6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	64 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	15.50	139.2
Floating-point performance	620.0 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 5670 and Radeon Pro 5500M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	168 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.5
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 5670 2.08

Pro 5500M 17.66
+749%

Pro 5500M outperforms HD 5670 by 749% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

ATI HD 5670 805

Pro 5500M 6832
+749%

Pro 5500M outperforms HD 5670 by 749% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

ATI HD 5670 1468

Pro 5500M 14725
+903%

Pro 5500M outperforms HD 5670 by 903% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	26 −746%	220−230 +746%
Full HD	32 −78.1%	57 +78.1%
1440p	5−6 −880%	49 +880%
4K	3−4 −967%	32 +967%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6

−460%

27−30
+460%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −1700%	35−40 +1700%
Battlefield 5	3−4 −2433%	76 +2433%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −309%	45−50 +309%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −460%	27−30 +460%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −2200%	45−50 +2200%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −6600%	67 +6600%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −1425%	60−65 +1425%
Hitman 3	3−4 −2600%	81 +2600%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −1133%	35−40 +1133%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −1000%	55 +1000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −625%	58 +625%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −1700%	35−40 +1700%
Battlefield 5	3−4 −1967%	62 +1967%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −54.5%	17 +54.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −460%	27−30 +460%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −2200%	45−50 +2200%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −6300%	64 +6300%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −1425%	60−65 +1425%
Hitman 3	3−4 −2033%	64 +2033%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −1133%	35−40 +1133%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −1133%	37 +1133%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −460%	28 +460%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −525%	50 +525%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −1260%	68 +1260%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −1700%	35−40 +1700%
Battlefield 5	3−4 −1867%	59 +1867%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −460%	27−30 +460%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −2650%	55 +2650%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −5600%	57 +5600%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −1425%	60−65 +1425%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −680%	39 +680%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −550%	24−27 +550%
Hitman 3	5−6 −460%	27−30 +460%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 −167%	24−27 +167%
Metro Exodus	0−1	22
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −1200%	12−14 +1200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −500%	30 +500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −1233%	40 +1233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −800%	18−20 +800%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −550%	12−14 +550%
Hitman 3	2−3 −700%	16−18 +700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	9−10
Far Cry 5	3−4 −567%	20 +567%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −320%	21 +320%

This is how ATI HD 5670 and Pro 5500M compete in popular games:

Pro 5500M is 746% faster in 900p
Pro 5500M is 78% faster in 1080p
Pro 5500M is 880% faster in 1440p
Pro 5500M is 967% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Pro 5500M is 6600% faster than the ATI HD 5670.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, Pro 5500M surpassed ATI HD 5670 in all 47 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.08	17.66
Recency	14 January 2010	13 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	64 Watt	50 Watt