UHD Graphics 615 vs Radeon HD 5570

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 5570 with UHD Graphics 615, including specs and performance data.

ATI HD 5570
2010
1 GB DDR3, 39 Watt
1.24

UHD Graphics 615 outperforms ATI HD 5570 by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1003918
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.020.92
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Gen. 9 Amber Lake (2018)
GPU code nameRedwoodKaby-Lake GT2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date9 February 2010 (14 years ago)30 August 2018 (5 years ago)
Current price$149 $518

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

UHD Graphics 615 has 4500% better value for money than ATI HD 5570.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40024
Core clock speed650 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors627 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)39 Watt5 Watt
Texture fill rate13.0025.20
Floating-point performance520.0 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 5570 and UHD Graphics 615 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
Length165 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3L/LPDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed667 - 900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1
VulkanN/A1.1.103

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 5570 1.24
UHD Graphics 615 1.59
+28.2%

UHD Graphics 615 outperforms Radeon HD 5570 by 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

ATI HD 5570 479
UHD Graphics 615 764
+59.5%

UHD Graphics 615 outperforms Radeon HD 5570 by 59% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

ATI HD 5570 1025
UHD Graphics 615 1221
+19.1%

UHD Graphics 615 outperforms Radeon HD 5570 by 19% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

ATI HD 5570 3917
+2.7%
UHD Graphics 615 3813

Radeon HD 5570 outperforms UHD Graphics 615 by 3% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p15
−20%
18−20
+20%
Full HD22
+83.3%
12
−83.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Hitman 3 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−50%
14−16
+50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Hitman 3 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−50%
14−16
+50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−50%
14−16
+50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 1−2

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 1−2
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 1−2
Hitman 3 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 1−2

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 1−2
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 1−2
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

This is how ATI HD 5570 and UHD Graphics 615 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 615 is 20% faster in 900p
  • ATI HD 5570 is 83% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.24 1.59
Recency 9 February 2010 30 August 2018
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 39 Watt 5 Watt

The UHD Graphics 615 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 5570 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 5570 is a desktop card while UHD Graphics 615 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 5570
Radeon HD 5570
Intel UHD Graphics 615
UHD Graphics 615

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 258 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 32 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 615 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.