Radeon RX 6700 XT vs HD 4850

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 4850 and Radeon RX 6700 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI HD 4850
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 110 Watt
2.66

RX 6700 XT outperforms ATI HD 4850 by a whopping 1835% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking77746
Place by popularitynot in top-10098
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.1723.11
ArchitectureTerascale 1 (2008−2010)Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameRV770Navi 22
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date25 June 2008 (16 years ago)3 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $479
Current price$138 (0.7x MSRP)$685 (1.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6700 XT has 13494% better value for money than ATI HD 4850.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8002560
Core clock speed625 MHz2321 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2581 MHz
Number of transistors956 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate25.00413.0
Floating-point performance1,000.0 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length246 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed993 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth63.55 GB/s384.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 4850 2.66
RX 6700 XT 51.47
+1835%

RX 6700 XT outperforms HD 4850 by 1835% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

ATI HD 4850 1026
RX 6700 XT 19880
+1838%

RX 6700 XT outperforms HD 4850 by 1838% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

ATI HD 4850 8972
RX 6700 XT 109039
+1115%

RX 6700 XT outperforms HD 4850 by 1115% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

ATI HD 4850 11272
RX 6700 XT 176617
+1467%

RX 6700 XT outperforms HD 4850 by 1467% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

ATI HD 4850 72891
RX 6700 XT 579310
+695%

RX 6700 XT outperforms HD 4850 by 695% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p28
−1686%
500−550
+1686%
Full HD38
−297%
151
+297%
1200p19
−1742%
350−400
+1742%
1440p4−5
−2050%
86
+2050%
4K2−3
−2400%
50
+2400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−2280%
119
+2280%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−1620%
85−90
+1620%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−4000%
160−170
+4000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1880%
99
+1880%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1960%
100−110
+1960%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−1686%
120−130
+1686%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−1509%
170−180
+1509%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2660%
138
+2660%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−1894%
359
+1894%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−1750%
110−120
+1750%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−2750%
342
+2750%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−660%
110−120
+660%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−1620%
85−90
+1620%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−4000%
160−170
+4000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1700%
90
+1700%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1960%
100−110
+1960%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−1686%
120−130
+1686%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−1509%
170−180
+1509%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2120%
111
+2120%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−1083%
210−220
+1083%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−1750%
110−120
+1750%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−2242%
281
+2242%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−3086%
223
+3086%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−660%
110−120
+660%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−1620%
85−90
+1620%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1600%
85
+1600%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1960%
100−110
+1960%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−1509%
170−180
+1509%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−972%
193
+972%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1900%
240
+1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−1714%
127
+1714%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−460%
84
+460%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−1750%
110−120
+1750%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−2525%
100−110
+2525%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−3933%
120−130
+3933%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−2750%
55−60
+2750%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1540%
80−85
+1540%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5500%
56
+5500%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−3325%
137
+3325%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2725%
110−120
+2725%
Hitman 3 8−9
−938%
83
+938%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−1971%
145
+1971%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−4050%
80−85
+4050%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−6100%
62
+6100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−1383%
85−90
+1383%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−4600%
45−50
+4600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−2267%
70−75
+2267%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1800%
35−40
+1800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−4700%
48
+4700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−3200%
30−35
+3200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−2667%
83
+2667%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−1420%
76
+1420%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 35

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1125%
45−50
+1125%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−2013%
169
+2013%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−2050%
120−130
+2050%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−1957%
144
+1957%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−2333%
73
+2333%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−1983%
125
+1983%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−2080%
109
+2080%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−1950%
123
+1950%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−2063%
173
+2063%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 2−3
−2300%
48
+2300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−2750%
57
+2750%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−2367%
74
+2367%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2400%
25
+2400%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2433%
75−80
+2433%

This is how ATI HD 4850 and RX 6700 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6700 XT is 1686% faster in 900p
  • RX 6700 XT is 297% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6700 XT is 1742% faster in 1200p
  • RX 6700 XT is 2050% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6700 XT is 2400% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6700 XT is 6100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6700 XT surpassed ATI HD 4850 in all 58 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.66 51.47
Recency 25 June 2008 3 March 2021
Cost $199 $479
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 230 Watt

The Radeon RX 6700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4850 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4850
Radeon HD 4850
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
Radeon RX 6700 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 254 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 5968 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.