Radeon 760M vs ATI HD 4850

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 4850 and Radeon 760M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI HD 4850
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 110 Watt
2.66

760M outperforms ATI HD 4850 by a whopping 461% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking812354
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.26no data
Power efficiency1.6668.11
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRV770Phoenix
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date25 June 2008 (16 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800512
Core clock speed625 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2599 MHz
Number of transistors956 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate25.0083.17
Floating-point processing power1 TFLOPS5.323 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs4032
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length246 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed993 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth63.55 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoMotherboard Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 4850 2.66
Radeon 760M 14.91
+461%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 4850 1026
Radeon 760M 5745
+460%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI HD 4850 8972
Radeon 760M 32985
+268%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

ATI HD 4850 11272
Radeon 760M 41767
+271%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p29
−452%
160−170
+452%
Full HD40
+25%
32
−25%
1200p19
−426%
100−110
+426%
1440p3−4
−533%
19
+533%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.98no data
1440p66.33no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−500%
30
+500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 24−27
Battlefield 5 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−343%
30−35
+343%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−380%
24
+380%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−620%
35−40
+620%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−500%
40−45
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−662%
95−100
+662%
Hitman 3 7−8
−314%
27−30
+314%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−267%
75−80
+267%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−2500%
50−55
+2500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−600%
40−45
+600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−355%
50−55
+355%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−108%
75−80
+108%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 24−27
Battlefield 5 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−343%
30−35
+343%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−260%
18
+260%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−620%
35−40
+620%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−500%
40−45
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−662%
95−100
+662%
Hitman 3 7−8
−314%
27−30
+314%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−267%
75−80
+267%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−2500%
50−55
+2500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−600%
40−45
+600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−300%
44
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−177%
35−40
+177%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−108%
75−80
+108%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 24−27
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−343%
30−35
+343%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−620%
35−40
+620%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−662%
95−100
+662%
Hitman 3 7−8
−314%
27−30
+314%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−267%
75−80
+267%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−236%
37
+236%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−76.9%
23
+76.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−108%
75−80
+108%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−600%
40−45
+600%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−625%
27−30
+625%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−475%
21−24
+475%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Hitman 3 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−343%
30−35
+343%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−481%
90−95
+481%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−317%
24−27
+317%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−1400%
14−16
+1400%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 6−7

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how ATI HD 4850 and Radeon 760M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 760M is 452% faster in 900p
  • ATI HD 4850 is 25% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 760M is 426% faster in 1200p
  • Radeon 760M is 533% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 760M is 2500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 760M is ahead in 57 tests (84%)
  • there's a draw in 11 tests (16%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.66 14.91
Recency 25 June 2008 8 January 2024
Chip lithography 55 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 760M has a 460.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 1275% more advanced lithography process, and 633.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 760M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4850 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4850
Radeon HD 4850
AMD Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 266 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 192 votes

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.