GeForce GTX 1650 vs ATI Radeon HD 4850

Place in the ranking	804	264
Place by popularity	not in top-100	3
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.21	39.54
Power efficiency	1.68	18.89
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	RV770	TU117
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	25 June 2008 (16 years ago)	23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$199	$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1650 has 18729% better value for money than ATI HD 4850.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	800	896
Core clock speed	625 MHz	1485 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1665 MHz
Number of transistors	956 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	25.00	93.24
Floating-point processing power	1 TFLOPS	2.984 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32
TMUs	40	56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	246 mm	229 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	993 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	63.55 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x S-Video	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.1	6.5
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 4850 2.66

GTX 1650 20.40
+667%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 4850 1026

GTX 1650 7873
+667%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI HD 4850 8972

GTX 1650 44694
+398%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

ATI HD 4850 11272

GTX 1650 50549
+348%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

ATI HD 4850 72891

GTX 1650 373333
+412%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	29 −659%	220−230 +659%
Full HD	40 −67.5%	67 +67.5%
1200p	19 −637%	140−150 +637%
1440p	4−5 −825%	37 +825%
4K	3−4 −700%	24 +700%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6

−540%

30−35
+540%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −489%	53 +489%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	47
Battlefield 5	4−5 −1875%	79 +1875%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −643%	52 +643%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −540%	30−35 +540%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1180%	64 +1180%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −1043%	80 +1043%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −1662%	229 +1662%
Hitman 3	7−8 −600%	49 +600%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −1290%	292 +1290%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −4950%	101 +4950%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −1183%	77 +1183%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −945%	115 +945%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −489%	224 +489%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −822%	83 +822%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	35
Battlefield 5	4−5 −1700%	72 +1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −557%	46 +557%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −540%	30−35 +540%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −940%	52 +940%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −700%	56 +700%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −1446%	201 +1446%
Hitman 3	7−8 −571%	47 +571%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −1138%	260 +1138%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −3450%	71 +3450%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −817%	55 +817%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −573%	74 +573%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −254%	45−50 +254%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −442%	206 +442%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −178%	25 +178%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	13
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −14.3%	8 +14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −540%	30−35 +540%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −680%	39 +680%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −400%	65 +400%
Hitman 3	7−8 −486%	41 +486%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −186%	60 +186%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −464%	62 +464%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −223%	42 +223%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +81%	21 −81%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7

−800%

54
+800%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −950%	42 +950%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −800%	36 +800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −800%	18 +800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1050%	21−24 +1050%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −700%	24 +700%
Hitman 3	8−9 −238%	27 +238%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −514%	43 +514%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −1100%	24−27 +1100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −806%	145 +806%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7

−483%

35
+483%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −1900%	20 +1900%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −1600%	17 +1600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −550%	13 +550%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −400%	5 +400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1100%	12 +1100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	8

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−325%

17
+325%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	13 +0%	13 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	122 +0%	122 +0%
Metro Exodus	41 +0%	41 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45 +0%	45 +0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3	13 +0%	13 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	41 +0%	41 +0%
Metro Exodus	27 +0%	27 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	26 +0%	26 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	30 +0%	30 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	26 +0%	26 +0%

This is how ATI HD 4850 and GTX 1650 compete in popular games:

GTX 1650 is 659% faster in 900p
GTX 1650 is 68% faster in 1080p
GTX 1650 is 637% faster in 1200p
GTX 1650 is 825% faster in 1440p
GTX 1650 is 700% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the ATI HD 4850 is 81% faster.
in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1650 is 4950% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

ATI HD 4850 is ahead in 1 test (1%)
GTX 1650 is ahead in 56 tests (82%)
there's a draw in 11 tests (16%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.66	20.40
Recency	25 June 2008	23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	4 GB
Chip lithography	55 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	75 Watt

GTX 1650 has a 666.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 358.3% more advanced lithography process, and 46.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1650 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4850 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.