Radeon R5 M430 vs HD 4550

Place in performance ranking	1163	896
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.04
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)	GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code name	RV710	Mars
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	30 September 2008 (15 years ago)	1 May 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$59	no data
Current price	$116 (2x MSRP)	$749

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

ATI HD 4550 and R5 M430 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	80	320
Core clock speed	600 MHz	955 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1030 MHz
Number of transistors	242 million	690 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	unknown
Texture fill rate	4.800	17.10
Floating-point performance	96 gflops	659.2 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 4550 and Radeon R5 M430 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	168 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR2	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	4 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1310 MHz	1746 MHz
Memory bandwidth	10.48 GB/s	16 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	4.1	5.1
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 4550 0.61

R5 M430 1.68
+175%

R5 M430 outperforms HD 4550 by 175% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

ATI HD 4550 235

R5 M430 648
+176%

R5 M430 outperforms HD 4550 by 176% in Passmark.