Radeon RX 6750 GRE vs ATI HD 4350

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 4350 and Radeon RX 6750 GRE, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI HD 4350
2008
512 MB DDR3, 20 Watt
0.37

RX 6750 GRE outperforms ATI HD 4350 by a whopping 12941% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking126969
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data46.28
Power efficiency1.2913.45
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRV710Navi 22
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date30 September 2008 (16 years ago)17 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores802560
Core clock speed600 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2581 MHz
Number of transistors242 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate4.800413.0
Floating-point processing power0.096 TFLOPSno data
ROPs464
TMUs8160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s432.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 4350 0.37
RX 6750 GRE 48.25
+12941%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 4350 143
RX 6750 GRE 18613
+12916%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD7
−12757%
900−950
+12757%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data0.61

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−12900%
260−270
+12900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−11567%
350−400
+11567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−12900%
260−270
+12900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−12900%
260−270
+12900%
Hitman 3 4−5
−12400%
500−550
+12400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−12400%
1000−1050
+12400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−12400%
500−550
+12400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−12936%
3650−3700
+12936%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−11567%
350−400
+11567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−12900%
260−270
+12900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−12900%
260−270
+12900%
Hitman 3 4−5
−12400%
500−550
+12400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−12400%
1000−1050
+12400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−12400%
500−550
+12400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−12678%
1150−1200
+12678%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−12936%
3650−3700
+12936%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−11567%
350−400
+11567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−12900%
260−270
+12900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−12900%
260−270
+12900%
Hitman 3 4−5
−12400%
500−550
+12400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−12400%
1000−1050
+12400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−12400%
500−550
+12400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−12678%
1150−1200
+12678%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−12936%
3650−3700
+12936%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7
−12400%
750−800
+12400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−12900%
260−270
+12900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−12900%
260−270
+12900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−12900%
130−140
+12900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−12900%
260−270
+12900%

This is how ATI HD 4350 and RX 6750 GRE compete in popular games:

  • RX 6750 GRE is 12757% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.37 48.25
Recency 30 September 2008 17 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 250 Watt

ATI HD 4350 has 1150% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 GRE, on the other hand, has a 12940.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4350 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4350
Radeon HD 4350
AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE
Radeon RX 6750 GRE

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 220 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 212 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.