GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB vs ATI Radeon HD 4350

Place in the ranking	1269	98
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	1.29	15.63
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	RV710	TU106
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	30 September 2008 (16 years ago)	7 December 2021 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	80	2176
Core clock speed	600 MHz	1470 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1650 MHz
Number of transistors	242 million	10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	20 Watt	184 Watt
Texture fill rate	4.800	224.4
Floating-point processing power	0.096 TFLOPS	7.181 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	48
TMUs	8	136
Tensor Cores	no data	272
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	34

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	229 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	12 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	400 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	6.4 GB/s	336.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.1	6.6
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 4350 0.37

RTX 2060 12 GB 41.23
+11043%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 4350 143

RTX 2060 12 GB 15907
+11024%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−10614%

750−800
+10614%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−10900%

220−230
+10900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −9900%	300−310 +9900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −10900%	220−230 +10900%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −10900%	220−230 +10900%
Hitman 3	4−5 −9900%	400−450 +9900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −10525%	850−900 +10525%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −9900%	400−450 +9900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −10971%	3100−3150 +10971%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −9900%	300−310 +9900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −10900%	220−230 +10900%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −10900%	220−230 +10900%
Hitman 3	4−5 −9900%	400−450 +9900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −10525%	850−900 +10525%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −9900%	400−450 +9900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −11011%	1000−1050 +11011%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −10971%	3100−3150 +10971%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −9900%	300−310 +9900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −10900%	220−230 +10900%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −10900%	220−230 +10900%
Hitman 3	4−5 −9900%	400−450 +9900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −10525%	850−900 +10525%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −9900%	400−450 +9900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −11011%	1000−1050 +11011%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −10971%	3100−3150 +10971%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Hitman 3	6−7 −10733%	650−700 +10733%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −10900%	220−230 +10900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−10900%

220−230
+10900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −10900%	110−120 +10900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−10900%

220−230
+10900%

This is how ATI HD 4350 and RTX 2060 12 GB compete in popular games:

RTX 2060 12 GB is 10614% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.37	41.23
Recency	30 September 2008	7 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	12 GB
Chip lithography	55 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	20 Watt	184 Watt

ATI HD 4350 has 820% lower power consumption.

RTX 2060 12 GB, on the other hand, has a 11043.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 358.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4350 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.