GeForce GT 710M vs Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
2022
4.34
+277%

Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) outperforms GeForce GT 710M by a whopping 277% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking6341034
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.49
ArchitectureRDNA 2 (2020−2022)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameRaphaelGF117
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date26 September 2022 (1 year ago)9 January 2013 (11 years ago)
Current priceno data$23

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12896
Core clock speedno data775 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data585 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data12.40
Floating-point performanceno data297.6 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) and GeForce GT 710M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data1 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkanno dataN/A
CUDAno data2.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD19
+280%
5−6
−280%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 0−1
Battlefield 5 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Hitman 3 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 19
+280%
5−6
−280%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
+325%
4−5
−325%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 0−1
Battlefield 5 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Far Cry 5 21
+320%
5−6
−320%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Hitman 3 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14
+367%
3−4
−367%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6
+500%
1−2
−500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9
+350%
2−3
−350%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Hitman 3 3−4 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 0−1

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3 0−1
Hitman 3 0−1 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

This is how Graphics (Ryzen 7000) and GT 710M compete in popular games:

  • Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is 280% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.34 1.15
Recency 26 September 2022 9 January 2013
Chip lithography 6 nm 28 nm

The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 710M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is a notebook card while GeForce GT 710M is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M
GeForce GT 710M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 171 vote

Rate Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 179 votes

Rate GeForce GT 710M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.