Radeon R7 370 vs 860M

Radeon 860M Radeon 880M Radeon 890M Radeon 8050S Radeon 8060S
VS
Radeon R7 340 OEM Radeon R7 350 Radeon R7 350 640SP Radeon R7 350 Fake Card Radeon R7 350 OEM Radeon R7 350X OEM Radeon R7 360 Radeon R7 360 896SP Radeon R7 360E Radeon R7 370 Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 860M with Radeon R7 370, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 860M
2025
15 Watt
10.92
+2.2%

860M outperforms R7 370 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Radeon 860M Radeon 860M
R7 370 R7 370

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking427431
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.11
Power efficiency54.367.25
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameStrix PointTrinidad
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Designno datareference
Release dateMarch 2025 (recently)18 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121024
Core clock speed400 MHzno data
Boost clock speed3000 MHz975 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate96.0062.40
Floating-point processing power3.072 TFLOPS1.997 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs3264
Ray Tracing Cores8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data152 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1 x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared975 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data179.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Eyefinity-+
Number of Eyefinity displaysno data6
HDMI-+
DisplayPort support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-+
CrossFire-+
FreeSync-+
TrueAudio-+
VCE-+
DDMA audiono data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)DirectX® 12
Shader Model6.85.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan1.3+
Mantle-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 860M 10.92
+2.2%
R7 370 10.68

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 860M 4600
+2.2%
R7 370 4503

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD25
−88%
47
+88%
1440p55−60
−3.6%
57
+3.6%
4K18−21
−11.1%
20
+11.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.17
1440pno data2.61
4Kno data7.45

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Fortnite 106
+0%
106
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 38
+0%
38
+0%
Valorant 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Dota 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Fortnite 41
+0%
41
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+0%
44
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30
+0%
30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
+0%
35
+0%
Valorant 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Dota 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+0%
22
+0%
Valorant 20
+0%
20
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30
+0%
30
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 81
+0%
81
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45
+0%
45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

This is how Radeon 860M and R7 370 compete in popular games:

  • R7 370 is 88% faster in 1080p
  • R7 370 is 4% faster in 1440p
  • R7 370 is 11% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 67 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 10.92 10.68
Chip lithography 4 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 110 Watt

Radeon 860M has a 2.2% higher aggregate performance score, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 633.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon 860M and Radeon R7 370.

Be aware that Radeon 860M is a notebook card while Radeon R7 370 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon 860M
Radeon 860M
AMD Radeon R7 370
Radeon R7 370
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R7 370 Radeon R7 370
vs
HD 7870 XT Radeon HD 7870 XT
R9 390X Radeon R9 390X
vs
Radeon 860M Radeon 860M
RX 480 Radeon RX 480
vs
Radeon 860M Radeon 860M
RX 470 Radeon RX 470
vs
Radeon 860M Radeon 860M
R9 380 Radeon R9 380
vs
Radeon 860M Radeon 860M
GTX 1050 Ti GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
vs
Radeon 860M Radeon 860M
GTX 950 GeForce GTX 950
vs
Radeon 860M Radeon 860M
Radeon 860M Radeon 860M
vs
RX 460 RX 460
GTX 1050 GeForce GTX 1050
vs
Radeon 860M Radeon 860M
GTX 1080 Ti GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
vs
Radeon 860M Radeon 860M
Radeon 860M Radeon 860M
vs
RX 570 Mobile RX 570 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 860M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 496 votes

Rate Radeon R7 370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 860M or Radeon R7 370, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.