GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile vs Radeon 8050S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 8050S and GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon 8050S
2025
55 Watt
38.30
+72.4%

8050S outperforms RTX 3050 4GB Mobile by an impressive 72% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking126272
Place by popularitynot in top-10048
Power efficiency52.7628.20
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameStrix HaloGN20-P0
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)11 May 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482048
Core clock speed1295 MHz1238 MHz
Boost clock speed2335 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology4 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate298.9no data
Floating-point processing power9.564 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs128no data
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared12000 MHz
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.3-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 8050S 38.30
+72.4%
RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 22.21

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Radeon 8050S 36323
+131%
RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 15712

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Radeon 8050S 79256
+83.4%
RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 43216

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon 8050S 23521
+96.8%
RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 11949

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Radeon 8050S 130145
+99.4%
RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 65252

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD95
+53.2%
62
−53.2%
1440p70−75
+62.8%
43
−62.8%
4K40−45
+53.8%
26
−53.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+36.4%
66
−36.4%
God of War 90−95
+82.4%
51
−82.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+41.9%
93
−41.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+73.1%
52
−73.1%
Far Cry 5 100
+47.1%
68
−47.1%
Fortnite 160−170
+46.5%
110−120
−46.5%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+64.4%
90−95
−64.4%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+39.1%
87
−39.1%
God of War 90−95
+121%
42
−121%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+72.7%
85−90
−72.7%
Valorant 220−230
+40.6%
160−170
−40.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+48.3%
89
−48.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+10.8%
250−260
−10.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+120%
41
−120%
Far Cry 5 96
+50%
64
−50%
Fortnite 160−170
+46.5%
110−120
−46.5%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+64.4%
90−95
−64.4%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+57.1%
77
−57.1%
God of War 90−95
+166%
35
−166%
Grand Theft Auto V 118
+37.2%
86
−37.2%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+87.8%
49
−87.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+72.7%
85−90
−72.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 156
+92.6%
81
−92.6%
Valorant 220−230
+40.6%
160−170
−40.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+59%
83
−59%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+165%
34
−165%
Far Cry 5 85
+39.3%
61
−39.3%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+64.4%
90−95
−64.4%
God of War 90−95
+304%
23
−304%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+72.7%
85−90
−72.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92
+100%
46
−100%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 160−170
+46.5%
110−120
−46.5%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+65.4%
160−170
−65.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+62.5%
48
−62.5%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+93.1%
29
−93.1%
Valorant 250−260
+29.9%
190−200
−29.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+48.5%
66
−48.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+150%
18
−150%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+89.8%
49
−89.8%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+89.7%
55−60
−89.7%
God of War 50−55
+85.2%
27−30
−85.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+103%
35−40
−103%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+88.9%
50−55
−88.9%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
+88.6%
44
−88.6%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+106%
17
−106%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+110%
29
−110%
Valorant 230−240
+77.3%
130−140
−77.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+74.3%
35
−74.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+233%
6
−233%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+168%
19
−168%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+82.5%
40−45
−82.5%
God of War 30−35
+83.3%
18−20
−83.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+117%
24−27
−117%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+108%
24−27
−108%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 170
+0%
170
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 125
+0%
125
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 36
+0%
36
+0%
Dota 2 118
+0%
118
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 112
+0%
112
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Dota 2 62
+0%
62
+0%

This is how Radeon 8050S and RTX 3050 4GB Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 8050S is 53% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 8050S is 63% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon 8050S is 54% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in God of War, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 8050S is 304% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 8050S is ahead in 54 tests (83%)
  • there's a draw in 11 tests (17%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.30 22.21
Recency 6 January 2025 11 May 2021
Chip lithography 4 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 60 Watt

Radeon 8050S has a 72.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 9.1% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 8050S is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 8050S
Radeon 8050S
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 8050S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 1742 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8050S or GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.