GRID M3-3020 vs Radeon 860M

Radeon 860M Radeon 880M Radeon 890M Radeon 8050S Radeon 8060S
VS
GRID M3-3020 GRID M10-8Q GRID M40 NVS 810 Quadro K620 Quadro K1200 Quadro K2200 Tesla M10

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 860M with GRID M3-3020, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 860M
2025
15 Watt
10.98
+56.6%

860M outperforms GRID M3-3020 by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Radeon 860M Radeon 860M
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3-3020

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking426546
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency54.65no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameStrix PointGM107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release dateMarch 2025 (recently)18 May 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512640
Core clock speed400 MHz1033 MHz
Boost clock speed3000 MHz1306 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate96.0052.24
Floating-point processing power3.072 TFLOPS1.672 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs3240
Ray Tracing Cores8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1300 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data83.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.85.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.31.1.126
CUDA-5.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD25
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+74.3%
35−40
−74.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+63.3%
30−33
−63.3%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+74.3%
35−40
−74.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+76.2%
21−24
−76.2%
Fortnite 65−70
+65%
40−45
−65%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+60%
30−33
−60%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+66.7%
24−27
−66.7%
Valorant 100−110
+68.3%
60−65
−68.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+63.3%
30−33
−63.3%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+74.3%
35−40
−74.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+63%
100−105
−63%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+76.2%
21−24
−76.2%
Fortnite 65−70
+65%
40−45
−65%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+60%
30−33
−60%
Grand Theft Auto V 24
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+66.7%
24−27
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+61.1%
18−20
−61.1%
Valorant 100−110
+68.3%
60−65
−68.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+63.3%
30−33
−63.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+76.2%
21−24
−76.2%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+60%
30−33
−60%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+66.7%
24−27
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+61.1%
18−20
−61.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65−70
+65%
40−45
−65%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
+70%
50−55
−70%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Valorant 120−130
+62.7%
75−80
−62.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+61.1%
18−20
−61.1%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+68.8%
16−18
−68.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Valorant 55−60
+68.6%
35−40
−68.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%

This is how Radeon 860M and GRID M3-3020 compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 860M is 79% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 10.98 7.01
Chip lithography 4 nm 28 nm

Radeon 860M has a 56.6% higher aggregate performance score, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 860M is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID M3-3020 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 860M is a notebook card while GRID M3-3020 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon 860M
Radeon 860M
NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
GRID M3-3020
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Radeon 860M Radeon 860M
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3 3020
vs
FirePro W5000 FirePro W5000
Radeon 860M Radeon 860M
vs
Radeon 760M Radeon 760M
Quadro GV100 GV100
vs
Radeon 860M 860M
Radeon 860M 860M
vs
RX Vega Mobile RX Vega Mobile
Radeon 860M 860M
vs
GRID M10-8Q GRID M10 8Q
Radeon 860M 860M
vs
RX 560 896SP RX 560 896SP
Radeon 860M 860M
vs
Quadro P620 P620
Radeon 860M 860M
vs
RX 550 640SP RX 550 640SP
Radeon 860M 860M
vs
GRID M60-1Q GRID M60 1Q
GRID M60-2Q GRID M60 2Q
vs
Radeon 860M 860M
Radeon 860M 860M
vs
GRID M60-4A GRID M60 4A
Radeon 860M 860M
vs
GRID M60-8Q GRID M60 8Q

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 860M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate GRID M3-3020 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 860M or GRID M3-3020, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.