Radeon 820M vs GRID M3-3020

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GRID M3-3020 GRID M10-8Q GRID M40 NVS 810 K620 K1200 K2200 Tesla M10
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
520 530 540X 610 610M 660M 680M 820M 840M 860M 880M 890M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID M3-3020 with Radeon 820M, including specs and performance data.

GRID M3-3020
2016
4 GB GDDR5
7.07
+38.6%

M3-3020 outperforms 820M by a substantial 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3-3020
Radeon 820M Radeon 820M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking594676
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)
GPU code nameGM107Krackan Point
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date18 May 2016 (9 years ago)March 2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640128
Core clock speed1033 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1306 MHz2800 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate52.2422.40
Floating-point processing power1.672 TFLOPS0.7168 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs408
Ray Tracing Coresno data2
L0 Cacheno data32 KB
L1 Cache320 KB32 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1300 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth83.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.4
CUDA5.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12−14
+20%
10
−20%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16
+0%
16
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how GRID M3-3020 and Radeon 820M compete in popular games:

  • GRID M3-3020 is 20% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 52 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 7.07 5.10
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm

GRID M3-3020 has a 39% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 820M, on the other hand, has a 600% more advanced lithography process.

The GRID M3-3020 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 820M in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID M3-3020 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 820M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GRID M3-3020 GRID M3-3020
vs
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
Radeon 820M Radeon 820M
vs
GeForce 945M GeForce 945M
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3-3020
vs
FirePro W5100 FirePro W5100
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3-3020
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5470 Mobility HD 5470
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3-3020
vs
Radeon 520 520
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3-3020
vs
GeForce2 GTS GeForce2 GTS
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3-3020
vs
Radeon 610 610
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3-3020
vs
RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB
RX 550 640SP RX 550 640SP
vs
RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile
GRID M60-1Q GRID M60-1Q
vs
GRID M60-8Q GRID M60-8Q
GRID M60-1Q GRID M60-1Q
vs
R7 A360 R7 A360
GRID M60-2Q GRID M60-2Q
vs
RTX 3070 Mobile RTX 3070 Mobile
GRID M60-2Q GRID M60-2Q
vs
Arc A570M Arc A570M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

5 1 vote

Rate GRID M3-3020 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon 820M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID M3-3020 or Radeon 820M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.