Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs 8060S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 8060S with Radeon AI PRO R9700, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 8060S
2025
55 Watt
42.10

AI PRO R9700 outperforms 8060S by an impressive 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10017
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency58.3117.99
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameStrix HaloNavi 48
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)23 July 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25604096
Core clock speed1295 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed2335 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate373.6747.5
Floating-point processing power11.96 TFLOPS47.84 TFLOPS
ROPs64128
TMUs160256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Cores4064

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2518 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data644.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.2
Vulkan1.31.3
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 8060S 42.10
AI PRO R9700 70.86
+68.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 8060S 17642
AI PRO R9700 29693
+68.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD112
−60.7%
180−190
+60.7%
1440p59
−61%
95−100
+61%
4K36
−66.7%
60−65
+66.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 230−240
−51.5%
350−400
+51.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−105
−60%
160−170
+60%
Hogwarts Legacy 100−110
−58.4%
160−170
+58.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
−65.5%
230−240
+65.5%
Counter-Strike 2 215
−62.8%
350−400
+62.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−105
−60%
160−170
+60%
Far Cry 5 114
−66.7%
190−200
+66.7%
Fortnite 180−190
−64.8%
300−310
+64.8%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
−65.6%
270−280
+65.6%
Forza Horizon 5 201
−49.3%
300−310
+49.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 100−110
−58.4%
160−170
+58.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
−65.6%
270−280
+65.6%
Valorant 240−250
−66%
400−450
+66%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
−65.5%
230−240
+65.5%
Counter-Strike 2 109
−65.1%
180−190
+65.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−61.9%
450−500
+61.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−105
−60%
160−170
+60%
Far Cry 5 108
−66.7%
180−190
+66.7%
Fortnite 180−190
−64.8%
300−310
+64.8%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
−65.6%
270−280
+65.6%
Forza Horizon 5 182
−64.8%
300−310
+64.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 129
−62.8%
210−220
+62.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 100−110
−58.4%
160−170
+58.4%
Metro Exodus 100−110
−65%
170−180
+65%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
−65.6%
270−280
+65.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 209
−67.5%
350−400
+67.5%
Valorant 240−250
−66%
400−450
+66%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
−65.5%
230−240
+65.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−105
−60%
160−170
+60%
Far Cry 5 100
−60%
160−170
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
−65.6%
270−280
+65.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 100−110
−58.4%
160−170
+58.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
−65.6%
270−280
+65.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 123
−62.6%
200−210
+62.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 180−190
−64.8%
300−310
+64.8%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 71
−54.9%
110−120
+54.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 290−300
−67.8%
500−550
+67.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 77
−55.8%
120−130
+55.8%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−56.3%
100−105
+56.3%
Valorant 270−280
−65.4%
450−500
+65.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
−68.2%
180−190
+68.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−66.7%
85−90
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 88
−59.1%
140−150
+59.1%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−61.3%
200−210
+61.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 50−55
−66.7%
85−90
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
−64.7%
140−150
+64.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
−66.7%
190−200
+66.7%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 36
−66.7%
60−65
+66.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 79
−64.6%
130−140
+64.6%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−66.7%
65−70
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 58
−63.8%
95−100
+63.8%
Valorant 250−260
−55.6%
400−450
+55.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
−61.8%
110−120
+61.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−66.7%
40−45
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 50
−60%
80−85
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−66.7%
140−150
+66.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
−66.7%
45−50
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
−63.9%
100−105
+63.9%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
−66.7%
95−100
+66.7%

This is how Radeon 8060S and AI PRO R9700 compete in popular games:

  • AI PRO R9700 is 61% faster in 1080p
  • AI PRO R9700 is 61% faster in 1440p
  • AI PRO R9700 is 67% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.10 70.86
Recency 6 January 2025 23 July 2025
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 300 Watt

Radeon 8060S has 445.5% lower power consumption.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 68.3% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 6 months.

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 8060S in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 8060S is a notebook graphics card while Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 8060S
Radeon 8060S
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 46 votes

Rate Radeon 8060S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8060S or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.