Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs RX 8060S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 8060S with Radeon AI PRO R9700, including specs and performance data.

RX 8060S
2025
40.27

AI PRO R9700 outperforms RX 8060S by an impressive 77% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11417
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data18.10
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameno dataNavi 48
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)23 July 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores404096
Core clock speedno data1660 MHz
Boost clock speed2900 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistorsno data53,900 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data300 Watt
Texture fill rateno data747.5
Floating-point processing powerno data47.84 TFLOPS
ROPsno data128
TMUsno data256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data32 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2518 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data644.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD103
−74.8%
180−190
+74.8%
1440p51
−76.5%
90−95
+76.5%
4K35
−71.4%
60−65
+71.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 220−230
−57%
350−400
+57%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
−66.7%
160−170
+66.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 95−100
−66.7%
160−170
+66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
−76.5%
240−250
+76.5%
Counter-Strike 2 215
−62.8%
350−400
+62.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
−66.7%
160−170
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 96
−66.7%
160−170
+66.7%
Fortnite 170−180
−71.4%
300−310
+71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
−72%
270−280
+72%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
−73.2%
220−230
+73.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 95−100
−66.7%
160−170
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−70.9%
270−280
+70.9%
Valorant 230−240
−70.9%
400−450
+70.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
−76.5%
240−250
+76.5%
Counter-Strike 2 109
−74.3%
190−200
+74.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−61.9%
450−500
+61.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
−66.7%
160−170
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 95
−68.4%
160−170
+68.4%
Fortnite 170−180
−71.4%
300−310
+71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
−72%
270−280
+72%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
−73.2%
220−230
+73.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 127
−73.2%
220−230
+73.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 95−100
−66.7%
160−170
+66.7%
Metro Exodus 95−100
−73.5%
170−180
+73.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−70.9%
270−280
+70.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
−70.1%
250−260
+70.1%
Valorant 230−240
−70.9%
400−450
+70.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
−76.5%
240−250
+76.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
−66.7%
160−170
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 92
−73.9%
160−170
+73.9%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
−72%
270−280
+72%
Hogwarts Legacy 95−100
−66.7%
160−170
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−70.9%
270−280
+70.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 101
−68.3%
170−180
+68.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 170−180
−71.4%
300−310
+71.4%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 71
−69%
120−130
+69%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 280−290
−76.1%
500−550
+76.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 70
−71.4%
120−130
+71.4%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−66.7%
100−105
+66.7%
Valorant 260−270
−69.8%
450−500
+69.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
−74.8%
180−190
+74.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−66.7%
80−85
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 95−100
−71.7%
170−180
+71.7%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−69.5%
200−210
+69.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
−66.7%
80−85
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
−64.6%
130−140
+64.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
−74.3%
190−200
+74.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 36
−66.7%
60−65
+66.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 76
−71.1%
130−140
+71.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
−73.1%
45−50
+73.1%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−75.7%
65−70
+75.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
−69.2%
110−120
+69.2%
Valorant 240−250
−61.9%
400−450
+61.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
−69.2%
110−120
+69.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−72.7%
95−100
+72.7%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−64.6%
130−140
+64.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
−73.1%
45−50
+73.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−75.4%
100−105
+75.4%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
−75.9%
95−100
+75.9%

This is how RX 8060S and AI PRO R9700 compete in popular games:

  • AI PRO R9700 is 75% faster in 1080p
  • AI PRO R9700 is 76% faster in 1440p
  • AI PRO R9700 is 71% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.27 71.19
Recency 6 January 2025 23 July 2025

AI PRO R9700 has a 76.8% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 6 months.

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 8060S in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 8060S is a notebook graphics card while Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 8060S
Radeon RX 8060S
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon RX 8060S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 8060S or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.